From Sources to Data: Medievalists, Demographers, and Computer Scientists Producing a Database from a Quattrocento Census (1964–1978)

Recent research in the discipline of history has explored the extent to which the datafication of historical sources has transformed the historian’s craft. Despite a significant body of knowledge, the crucial issue of the epistemological status of data is still overlooked in the discipline. Following recent research in data studies, this article claims that, in order to study the uses and accessibility of data, one should ask what led these data to serve as evidence in the first place. This article implements such an approach by analyzing the intellectual and material operations that led to the production of a database in an interdisciplinary collective between 1964 and 1978. I show how this raised major challenges for the historians who supervised the project. What practices and rules did they invent? What blueprint did they follow? And what is the epistemological status of the database they produced? I argue that these scholars invented a genuine approach to extracting data, in line with preexisting rules for editing historical sources. Criteria for future reuses of data outside their context of production are also examined.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History of Humanities
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/737038
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Sources to Data: Medievalists, Demographers, and Computer Scientists Producing a Database from a Quattrocento Census (1964–1978)

History of Humanities
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

From Sources to Data: Medievalists, Demographers, and Computer Scientists Producing a Database from a Quattrocento Census (1964–1978)

article en

Abstract

Recent research in the discipline of history has explored the extent to which the datafication of historical sources has transformed the historian’s craft. Despite a significant body of knowledge, the crucial issue of the epistemological status of data is still overlooked in the discipline. Following recent research in data studies, this article claims that, in order to study the uses and accessibility of data, one should ask what led these data to serve as evidence in the first place. This article implements such an approach by analyzing the intellectual and material operations that led to the production of a database in an interdisciplinary collective between 1964 and 1978. I show how this raised major challenges for the historians who supervised the project. What practices and rules did they invent? What blueprint did they follow? And what is the epistemological status of the database they produced? I argue that these scholars invented a genuine approach to extracting data, in line with preexisting rules for editing historical sources. Criteria for future reuses of data outside their context of production are also examined.

History of HumanitiesVol. 10(2)
Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Université de Rouen Normandie (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.