Research note: Legislating Uncertainty: Election Policies and the Amplification of Misinformation

Can state election policies affect the spread of misinformation? This paper studies the role played by ballot processing policies, which determine when ballots can be examined and organized, in the online spread of political misinformation. We present evidence from the 2020 U.S. presidential election cycle linking the spread of misinformation in the aftermath of the election to the uncertainty created by these restrictions. Specifically, using a novel dataset of 317 misinformation stories constructed using over 4,700,000 posts collected in real‐time throughout the 2020 electoral period, we examine whether restrictions on the ability of election officials to process ballots corresponded with increases in the prevalence of misinformation on X/Twitter. We find that, relative to states with restrictions, states that allowed ballots to be processed in advance of the election were subjected to fewer misinformation stories. The results suggest that policymakers interested in limiting the amount of misinformation targeting their state institutions should remove barriers to pre‐election ballot processing.

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-07-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-280140
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research note: Legislating Uncertainty: Election Policies and the Amplification of Misinformation

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Research note: Legislating Uncertainty: Election Policies and the Amplification of Misinformation

article en

Abstract

Can state election policies affect the spread of misinformation? This paper studies the role played by ballot processing policies, which determine when ballots can be examined and organized, in the online spread of political misinformation. We present evidence from the 2020 U.S. presidential election cycle linking the spread of misinformation in the aftermath of the election to the uncertainty created by these restrictions. Specifically, using a novel dataset of 317 misinformation stories constructed using over 4,700,000 posts collected in real‐time throughout the 2020 electoral period, we examine whether restrictions on the ability of election officials to process ballots corresponded with increases in the prevalence of misinformation on X/Twitter. We find that, relative to states with restrictions, states that allowed ballots to be processed in advance of the election were subjected to fewer misinformation stories. The results suggest that policymakers interested in limiting the amount of misinformation targeting their state institutions should remove barriers to pre‐election ballot processing.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.