Machine learning for predicting sense of place among hybrid workers: A SHAP-based analysis of key factors

The rise of hybrid work has fundamentally altered how employees experience office spaces, disrupting established patterns of place-making. To identify and quantify the relative importance of key factors shaping hybrid workers' sense of place in office environments, this study employs machine learning with SHAP analysis. Based on survey data from 242 German hybrid workers, four machine learning models were compared, with the Lasso model achieving the best performance (accuracy = 0.80, AUC = 0.86). SHAP analysis identifies office environment satisfaction (SHAP value = 0.288) as the dominant factor, more than three times as influential as conscientiousness (0.087), the second-ranked factor. Additional key influential factors encompass workspace configuration (fixed desk availability, office sharing type), personality traits (neuroticism), office work percentage, and boundary management (life-to-work segmentation/integration). The findings suggest that organizations should prioritize optimizing physical office environments to enhance hybrid workers' sense of place.

Publication Details

Journal
Wellbeing Space and Society
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2025.100328
Primary Topic
Facilities and Workplace Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning for predicting sense of place among hybrid workers: A SHAP-based analysis of key factors

Wellbeing Space and Society
Facilities and Workplace Management
article

Machine learning for predicting sense of place among hybrid workers: A SHAP-based analysis of key factors

article en

Abstract

The rise of hybrid work has fundamentally altered how employees experience office spaces, disrupting established patterns of place-making. To identify and quantify the relative importance of key factors shaping hybrid workers' sense of place in office environments, this study employs machine learning with SHAP analysis. Based on survey data from 242 German hybrid workers, four machine learning models were compared, with the Lasso model achieving the best performance (accuracy = 0.80, AUC = 0.86). SHAP analysis identifies office environment satisfaction (SHAP value = 0.288) as the dominant factor, more than three times as influential as conscientiousness (0.087), the second-ranked factor. Additional key influential factors encompass workspace configuration (fixed desk availability, office sharing type), personality traits (neuroticism), office work percentage, and boundary management (life-to-work segmentation/integration). The findings suggest that organizations should prioritize optimizing physical office environments to enhance hybrid workers' sense of place.

Wellbeing Space and SocietyVol. 9
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Facilities and Workplace Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.