Islamic Epistemology: The Integration of Knowledge and Contemporary Challenges from an Islamic Scholarly Perspective

Islamic epistemology is confronted with a range of contemporary challenges arising from the secularization of knowledge, disciplinary fragmentation, and the intellectual identity crisis within Muslim societies. These issues stem from the dominance of a secular Western epistemological paradigm that separates knowledge from divine values, resulting in a dichotomy between religious sciences (ʿulūm al-dīn) and worldly sciences (ʿulūm al-dunyā). This study aims to re-examine the foundations of Islamic epistemology grounded in the principle of tawḥīd and to evaluate the relevance of A. Amin Abdullah’s integration–interconnection paradigm as a methodological response in contemporary Islamic studies. Employing a library research method, this study analyzes classical and modern sources—such as Al-Attas, Nasr, Al-Faruqi, and Amin Abdullah—using content analysis to identify epistemic patterns and assess their significance for present-day academic discourse. Findings reveal that the secularization of knowledge has produced a crisis of value and purpose, as highlighted by Al-Attas and Nasr, who argue that the loss of adab results in epistemic confusion and moral disorientation. Additionally, the sharp divide between Islamic sciences and empirical disciplines has led to epistemological fragmentation, causing both religious scholars and modern scientists to lose the essential connection between text, reason, and socio-historical reality. The study further demonstrates that Amin Abdullah’s integration–interconnection paradigm offers a robust epistemological framework by synthesizing the bayānī (textual), burhānī (rational), and ʿirfānī (spiritual-intuitive) domains within a dialogical and multidisciplinary model. This paradigm not only restores the balanced relationship between revelation, reason, and experience but also enables the development of knowledge that is socially relevant, ethically grounded, and spiritually meaningful. The study concludes that reconstructing Islamic epistemology based on tawḥīd and interdisciplinary integration is an urgent agenda for addressing modern intellectual challenges. Amin Abdullah’s paradigm proves to be an effective epistemological bridge connecting religious sciences, the humanities, and science–technology, thereby offering a holistic foundation for higher education curricula. Thus, Islamic epistemology possesses the potential not only to respond to contemporary issues but also to serve as an intellectual framework capable of fostering a morally grounded and scientifically advanced modern Islamic civilization.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17678277
Primary Topic
Education and Islamic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Islamic Epistemology: The Integration of Knowledge and Contemporary Challenges from an Islamic Scholarly Perspective

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Education and Islamic Studies
article

Islamic Epistemology: The Integration of Knowledge and Contemporary Challenges from an Islamic Scholarly Perspective

article en

Abstract

Islamic epistemology is confronted with a range of contemporary challenges arising from the secularization of knowledge, disciplinary fragmentation, and the intellectual identity crisis within Muslim societies. These issues stem from the dominance of a secular Western epistemological paradigm that separates knowledge from divine values, resulting in a dichotomy between religious sciences (ʿulūm al-dīn) and worldly sciences (ʿulūm al-dunyā). This study aims to re-examine the foundations of Islamic epistemology grounded in the principle of tawḥīd and to evaluate the relevance of A. Amin Abdullah’s integration–interconnection paradigm as a methodological response in contemporary Islamic studies. Employing a library research method, this study analyzes classical and modern sources—such as Al-Attas, Nasr, Al-Faruqi, and Amin Abdullah—using content analysis to identify epistemic patterns and assess their significance for present-day academic discourse. Findings reveal that the secularization of knowledge has produced a crisis of value and purpose, as highlighted by Al-Attas and Nasr, who argue that the loss of adab results in epistemic confusion and moral disorientation. Additionally, the sharp divide between Islamic sciences and empirical disciplines has led to epistemological fragmentation, causing both religious scholars and modern scientists to lose the essential connection between text, reason, and socio-historical reality. The study further demonstrates that Amin Abdullah’s integration–interconnection paradigm offers a robust epistemological framework by synthesizing the bayānī (textual), burhānī (rational), and ʿirfānī (spiritual-intuitive) domains within a dialogical and multidisciplinary model. This paradigm not only restores the balanced relationship between revelation, reason, and experience but also enables the development of knowledge that is socially relevant, ethically grounded, and spiritually meaningful. The study concludes that reconstructing Islamic epistemology based on tawḥīd and interdisciplinary integration is an urgent agenda for addressing modern intellectual challenges. Amin Abdullah’s paradigm proves to be an effective epistemological bridge connecting religious sciences, the humanities, and science–technology, thereby offering a holistic foundation for higher education curricula. Thus, Islamic epistemology possesses the potential not only to respond to contemporary issues but also to serve as an intellectual framework capable of fostering a morally grounded and scientifically advanced modern Islamic civilization.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Education and Islamic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.