Tracking the Impact of Open Science: Are We Measuring What Matters?

This invited panel will be a forum to discuss the current landscape of Impact and Monitoring of Open Science, by bringing together global voices to discuss how impact is defined, which methods and indicators can capture it, and how perspectives differ across contexts, from global frameworks to national monitors and institutional practices. Through a lively discussion, panelists will address key questions: What does “impact” mean in different contexts, and how should we balance economic, societal, and research outcomes? How can we monitor long-term effects while still providing timely evidence for decision-makers? What is the link between open practices and changes in research culture, and can this be measured meaningfully? How do perspectives from the Global South challenge and enrich current approaches to impact assessment? Are today’s indicators capturing what really matters, or do we need to rethink how we measure Open Science impact? Join us for a dynamic session that will surface tensions, trade-offs, and fresh ideas on moving from compliance metrics toward meaningful evidence of Open Science’s value and impact.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17663439
Primary Topic
Academic Publishing and Open Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracking the Impact of Open Science: Are We Measuring What Matters?

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Academic Publishing and Open Access
article

Tracking the Impact of Open Science: Are We Measuring What Matters?

article en

Abstract

This invited panel will be a forum to discuss the current landscape of Impact and Monitoring of Open Science, by bringing together global voices to discuss how impact is defined, which methods and indicators can capture it, and how perspectives differ across contexts, from global frameworks to national monitors and institutional practices. Through a lively discussion, panelists will address key questions: What does “impact” mean in different contexts, and how should we balance economic, societal, and research outcomes? How can we monitor long-term effects while still providing timely evidence for decision-makers? What is the link between open practices and changes in research culture, and can this be measured meaningfully? How do perspectives from the Global South challenge and enrich current approaches to impact assessment? Are today’s indicators capturing what really matters, or do we need to rethink how we measure Open Science impact? Join us for a dynamic session that will surface tensions, trade-offs, and fresh ideas on moving from compliance metrics toward meaningful evidence of Open Science’s value and impact.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University College Dublin (IE), National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE), Université Paris Cité (FR), Centre de Recherche en Informatique (FR), Athena Research and Innovation Center In Information Communication & Knowledge Technologies (GR), OpenAIRE Non-Profit Civil Partnership
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Academic Publishing and Open Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.