Telling Compounds and Phrases Apart in Vietnamese. A Random Forest Classification

Vietnamese is an isolating language with rich productive compounding, but no morphosyntactic, phonotactic or phonological evidence to assume a linguistic level between the syllable and the phrase (Schiering et al. 2010). We model an artificial listener with a Random Forest Classifier, to study the phonetic distinguishability of compounds vs. phrases, following Nguyen and Ingram (2007). This Machine Learning algorithm represents the maximal potential for a system to differentiate the two classes based on phonetics alone. It ranks the importance of each phonetic correlate to the differentiation of these classes. This allows an interpretation beyond whether a difference on a particular phonetic dimension exists including how important this difference is. The results confirm that the two classes can only be phonetically separated under circumstances of maximal contrast, and that maximal contrast is realized through juncture marking. Furthermore, we show that the two classes cannot be perfectly separated even under conditions of maximal contrast and additionally that there is an across-the-board preference for a compound interpretation from the phonetic data, even when the Random Forest Classifier was trained on maximal contrast data.

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-280142
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Telling Compounds and Phrases Apart in Vietnamese. A Random Forest Classification

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Telling Compounds and Phrases Apart in Vietnamese. A Random Forest Classification

article en

Abstract

Vietnamese is an isolating language with rich productive compounding, but no morphosyntactic, phonotactic or phonological evidence to assume a linguistic level between the syllable and the phrase (Schiering et al. 2010). We model an artificial listener with a Random Forest Classifier, to study the phonetic distinguishability of compounds vs. phrases, following Nguyen and Ingram (2007). This Machine Learning algorithm represents the maximal potential for a system to differentiate the two classes based on phonetics alone. It ranks the importance of each phonetic correlate to the differentiation of these classes. This allows an interpretation beyond whether a difference on a particular phonetic dimension exists including how important this difference is. The results confirm that the two classes can only be phonetically separated under circumstances of maximal contrast, and that maximal contrast is realized through juncture marking. Furthermore, we show that the two classes cannot be perfectly separated even under conditions of maximal contrast and additionally that there is an across-the-board preference for a compound interpretation from the phonetic data, even when the Random Forest Classifier was trained on maximal contrast data.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.