A Checklist for Incentivizing and Facilitating Good Theory Building

Psychology is facing a theory crisis characterized by ambiguous theories that lead to inconclusive theory tests. To address this problem, we propose a checklist designed to establish hygiene standards for assessing theoretical rigor in psychological research. This checklist contains operationalized criteria applicable to the development of both verbal and formal theories as well as tests of these. If the checklist is used as part of evaluation schemes (e.g., in hiring), it can further incentivize theory building, and if it is used as step-by-step guidance for how to proceed during theory building, it may also facilitate better theorizing. Developing and testing precise theories in psychology is more challenging than is typically acknowledged. Given this, we advocate for the (re-)creation of a dedicated field of theoretical psychology and specialized journals that support the publication of well-developed theories even without tests.

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-280426
Primary Topic
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Checklist for Incentivizing and Facilitating Good Theory Building

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
article

A Checklist for Incentivizing and Facilitating Good Theory Building

article en

Abstract

Psychology is facing a theory crisis characterized by ambiguous theories that lead to inconclusive theory tests. To address this problem, we propose a checklist designed to establish hygiene standards for assessing theoretical rigor in psychological research. This checklist contains operationalized criteria applicable to the development of both verbal and formal theories as well as tests of these. If the checklist is used as part of evaluation schemes (e.g., in hiring), it can further incentivize theory building, and if it is used as step-by-step guidance for how to proceed during theory building, it may also facilitate better theorizing. Developing and testing precise theories in psychology is more challenging than is typically acknowledged. Given this, we advocate for the (re-)creation of a dedicated field of theoretical psychology and specialized journals that support the publication of well-developed theories even without tests.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.