The Relationship between the Size of Functional Structure, Degree of Semantic Analyzability, and Syntactic Inflexibility in Palestinian ArabicIdioms

This paper investigates the relationship between the size of functional structure, the degree of semantic non-compositionality, and syntactic inflexibility in two distinct classes of idioms in Palestinian Arabic: VoiceP idioms and √P idioms. Building on diagnostics introduced by Nunberg,Sag,andWasow(1994)andextendedintheStructuralRequirementModelbyStone (2009, 2015, 2016) into a functional-structural typology of idioms, I refine this framework through a detailed investigation of idiomatic constructions in Palestinian Arabic. I propose that √P idioms are semantically analyzable, exhibiting internal idiomatic mapping of indi vidual constituents, whereas VoiceP idioms retain configurationality and they are interpreted holistically. Idiomatic Phrases, i.e., VoiceP idioms (e.g., kick the bucket), are mapped onto a single, non-compositional meaning such as “die.” In contrast, Idiomatically Combining Expressions, i.e., √P idioms (e.g., spill the beans), involve the verb (spill) being mapped onto one idiomatic meaning (e.g., “reveal”) and the object (the beans) being mapped onto another idiomatic meaning(e.g., “thesecret”). Idiscussaconvergentsetofdiagnostics: internalargu mentmodifiability and quantifiability, relative clause formation and topicalization, anaphoric reference and NP ellipsis that collectively serve to differentiate between idioms that exhibit larger functional structures (VoiceP idioms) and those that project smaller ones (√P idioms). This distinction is argued to reflect a deeper structural Encyclopedic contrast: VoiceP id ioms demonstrate larger functional structures, while √P idioms are structurally small. This distinction concurs well with the Structural Requirement Model, which proposes that while the former is structurally large, the latter is structurally small. Finally, the paper addresses determiner variability in ICEs in light of DM-inspired Encyclopedic Entries.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PRSM
Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34874/prsm.ijal-vol11.59143
Primary Topic
Categorization, perception, and language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Relationship between the Size of Functional Structure, Degree of Semantic Analyzability, and Syntactic Inflexibility in Palestinian ArabicIdioms

PRSM
Categorization, perception, and language
article

The Relationship between the Size of Functional Structure, Degree of Semantic Analyzability, and Syntactic Inflexibility in Palestinian ArabicIdioms

article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between the size of functional structure, the degree of semantic non-compositionality, and syntactic inflexibility in two distinct classes of idioms in Palestinian Arabic: VoiceP idioms and √P idioms. Building on diagnostics introduced by Nunberg,Sag,andWasow(1994)andextendedintheStructuralRequirementModelbyStone (2009, 2015, 2016) into a functional-structural typology of idioms, I refine this framework through a detailed investigation of idiomatic constructions in Palestinian Arabic. I propose that √P idioms are semantically analyzable, exhibiting internal idiomatic mapping of indi vidual constituents, whereas VoiceP idioms retain configurationality and they are interpreted holistically. Idiomatic Phrases, i.e., VoiceP idioms (e.g., kick the bucket), are mapped onto a single, non-compositional meaning such as “die.” In contrast, Idiomatically Combining Expressions, i.e., √P idioms (e.g., spill the beans), involve the verb (spill) being mapped onto one idiomatic meaning (e.g., “reveal”) and the object (the beans) being mapped onto another idiomatic meaning(e.g., “thesecret”). Idiscussaconvergentsetofdiagnostics: internalargu mentmodifiability and quantifiability, relative clause formation and topicalization, anaphoric reference and NP ellipsis that collectively serve to differentiate between idioms that exhibit larger functional structures (VoiceP idioms) and those that project smaller ones (√P idioms). This distinction is argued to reflect a deeper structural Encyclopedic contrast: VoiceP id ioms demonstrate larger functional structures, while √P idioms are structurally small. This distinction concurs well with the Structural Requirement Model, which proposes that while the former is structurally large, the latter is structurally small. Finally, the paper addresses determiner variability in ICEs in light of DM-inspired Encyclopedic Entries.

PRSM
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Categorization, perception, and language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.