Pilot-scale membrane distillation modeling: Validation, comparison, and consensus

Pilot-scale air-gap membrane distillation (AGMD) models have shown inconsistent predictive performance due to the lack of modeling consensus and validation across diverse systems. This study presents the first robust, cross-system validation and refinement of four pilot-scale AGMD models using an aggregated experimental dataset of 2716 datapoints that cover a wide range of feed salinities, module sizes, membrane and spacer configurations, and both AGMD and vacuum-assisted AGMD (V-AGMD) systems. Modeling consensus was achieved under real-world operating conditions by (i) using empirical correlations for the Nusselt number, (ii) applying a resistance-in-series approach for the thermal conductivity of the membrane, (iii) incorporating the ePTFE support layer into the air gap, and (iv) accounting for entrapped distillate in the air gap. The adjustments were guided by measurements, imaging, and literature, and were analyzed using root-mean-square error and mean error. The resulting modeling consensus and aggregated dataset provide a reliable foundation for AGMD system design, model calibration, and performance optimization across the broader range of operating conditions for which MD is being applied. This work also provides additional insight into how entrapped distillate influences the performance of AGMD. • Validated four pilot-scale AGMD models using 2716 datapoints across broad conditions. • Achieved modeling consensus guided by measurements, imaging, and literature. • Extended model ability to generalize beyond the original development data. • Provided insights into how vacuum increases distillate flux and energy efficiency.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Desalination
Published
2025-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2025.119674
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Membrane Separation Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pilot-scale membrane distillation modeling: Validation, comparison, and consensus

2 citations
Desalination
Membrane Separation Technologies
1.63
article

Pilot-scale membrane distillation modeling: Validation, comparison, and consensus

article en
2 citations

Abstract

Pilot-scale air-gap membrane distillation (AGMD) models have shown inconsistent predictive performance due to the lack of modeling consensus and validation across diverse systems. This study presents the first robust, cross-system validation and refinement of four pilot-scale AGMD models using an aggregated experimental dataset of 2716 datapoints that cover a wide range of feed salinities, module sizes, membrane and spacer configurations, and both AGMD and vacuum-assisted AGMD (V-AGMD) systems. Modeling consensus was achieved under real-world operating conditions by (i) using empirical correlations for the Nusselt number, (ii) applying a resistance-in-series approach for the thermal conductivity of the membrane, (iii) incorporating the ePTFE support layer into the air gap, and (iv) accounting for entrapped distillate in the air gap. The adjustments were guided by measurements, imaging, and literature, and were analyzed using root-mean-square error and mean error. The resulting modeling consensus and aggregated dataset provide a reliable foundation for AGMD system design, model calibration, and performance optimization across the broader range of operating conditions for which MD is being applied. This work also provides additional insight into how entrapped distillate influences the performance of AGMD. • Validated four pilot-scale AGMD models using 2716 datapoints across broad conditions. • Achieved modeling consensus guided by measurements, imaging, and literature. • Extended model ability to generalize beyond the original development data. • Provided insights into how vacuum increases distillate flux and energy efficiency.

DesalinationVol. 620
University of Southern California (US), University of Arizona (US), Colorado School of Mines (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Ghent University (BE), Novem (Netherlands) (NL), Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo (ES), Centre for Advanced Process Technology for Urban Resource Recovery (BE), Istanbul Technical University (TR), University of Almería (ES)
Department of Water Resources, University of Southern California, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Membrane Separation Technologies
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.