Technology-enabled surveillance as a regime characteristic: re-authoritarianization in Central Asia

Rapidly advancing information and communication technologies, along with the proliferation of artificial intelligence and closed-circuit television, have profoundly reshaped state-society relations worldwide. Initially celebrated for their democratizing potential, these technologies have, over the past two decades, ushered in a wave of technology-enabled re-authoritarianization, with even established democracies now “at risk.” While numerous terms—such as digital authoritarianism and digital repression—seek to capture this shift, political science has largely neglected the structural role of technology-enabled surveillance. To address this gap, we propose extending Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan's (1996) seminal typology of regime characteristics by adding technology-enabled surveillance as a fifth dimension. To illustrate the empirical relevance of this conceptual extension, the contributions to our special section focus on Central Asia—a region marked by both rapid digitalization and authoritarian resurgence. They show how technological infrastructure is no longer a neutral tool but an essential regime characteristic.

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-280081
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technology-enabled surveillance as a regime characteristic: re-authoritarianization in Central Asia

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

Technology-enabled surveillance as a regime characteristic: re-authoritarianization in Central Asia

article en

Abstract

Rapidly advancing information and communication technologies, along with the proliferation of artificial intelligence and closed-circuit television, have profoundly reshaped state-society relations worldwide. Initially celebrated for their democratizing potential, these technologies have, over the past two decades, ushered in a wave of technology-enabled re-authoritarianization, with even established democracies now “at risk.” While numerous terms—such as digital authoritarianism and digital repression—seek to capture this shift, political science has largely neglected the structural role of technology-enabled surveillance. To address this gap, we propose extending Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan's (1996) seminal typology of regime characteristics by adding technology-enabled surveillance as a fifth dimension. To illustrate the empirical relevance of this conceptual extension, the contributions to our special section focus on Central Asia—a region marked by both rapid digitalization and authoritarian resurgence. They show how technological infrastructure is no longer a neutral tool but an essential regime characteristic.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.