Assessing the Influence of Implant Scan Body Material on Desktop Scanner Accuracy: An In Vitro Study

There are limited studies analyzing the accuracy of desktop scanners with scan bodies made of different materials but of the same design. The purpose of this in vitro study is to examine the effect of scan bodies made of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) on the accuracy of desktop scanners that have different scanning technologies (white light vs blue light). Two upper jaw models with a missing left second premolar were obtained. An implant (Bilimplant) was placed in the area where the missing tooth was located. The titanium and PEEK scan bodies were torqued, and an industrial scanner obtained reference data. A total of 40 scans were recorded using two desktop scanners (Dentium and Kivi). Ti-Dentium, Ti-Kivi, PEEK-Dentium, and PEEK-Kivi were identified as the four test groups. Each STL file was imported into Geomagic for reverse engineering. The deviation between the experimental scan and the reference data was analyzed using a best-fit algorithm to determine the accuracy of each scan. Deviation values were compared using nonparametric tests. The average deviation values ± standard deviation observed across the groups were 65 ± 4.5 μm, 81 ± 3.1 μm, 24 ± 5.4 μm, and 47 ± 9.1 μm, respectively. Group Ti-K exhibited the highest average deviation, whereas Group PEEK-D demonstrated the lowest. A statistically significant difference was found between all groups (P < .05). Within the limitations of this in vitro study, PEEK scan bodies and white light scanners demonstrated superior accuracy, which may be clinically relevant in high-precision implant restorations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Oral Implantology
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-25-00133
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Influence of Implant Scan Body Material on Desktop Scanner Accuracy: An In Vitro Study

Journal of Oral Implantology
Dental materials and restorations
article

Assessing the Influence of Implant Scan Body Material on Desktop Scanner Accuracy: An In Vitro Study

article en

Abstract

There are limited studies analyzing the accuracy of desktop scanners with scan bodies made of different materials but of the same design. The purpose of this in vitro study is to examine the effect of scan bodies made of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) on the accuracy of desktop scanners that have different scanning technologies (white light vs blue light). Two upper jaw models with a missing left second premolar were obtained. An implant (Bilimplant) was placed in the area where the missing tooth was located. The titanium and PEEK scan bodies were torqued, and an industrial scanner obtained reference data. A total of 40 scans were recorded using two desktop scanners (Dentium and Kivi). Ti-Dentium, Ti-Kivi, PEEK-Dentium, and PEEK-Kivi were identified as the four test groups. Each STL file was imported into Geomagic for reverse engineering. The deviation between the experimental scan and the reference data was analyzed using a best-fit algorithm to determine the accuracy of each scan. Deviation values were compared using nonparametric tests. The average deviation values ± standard deviation observed across the groups were 65 ± 4.5 μm, 81 ± 3.1 μm, 24 ± 5.4 μm, and 47 ± 9.1 μm, respectively. Group Ti-K exhibited the highest average deviation, whereas Group PEEK-D demonstrated the lowest. A statistically significant difference was found between all groups (P < .05). Within the limitations of this in vitro study, PEEK scan bodies and white light scanners demonstrated superior accuracy, which may be clinically relevant in high-precision implant restorations.

Journal of Oral ImplantologyVol. 52(1)
Giresun University (TR), Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing the Influence of Implant Scan Body Material on Desktop Scanner Accuracy: An In Vitro Study · Journal of Oral Implantology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS