Legal Liability for AI Decisions

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is now deeply embedded in decision-making processes across diverse fields such as healthcare, banking, transportation, and even judicial systems. While this integration has improved efficiency, it has also generated unprecedented legal challenges regarding liability when AI-driven decisions cause harm. Traditional liability frameworks, which rest on human fault or intent, are ill-suited to address autonomous and opaque AI systems. This paper examines the inadequacies of existing doctrines, surveys international approaches, and evaluates new proposals such as the European Union’s AI Liability Directive. It further explores theoretical models, debates on digital personhood, and the role of corporate governance. The study concludes that an effective legal regime for AI must balance innovation with accountability through strict liability mechanisms, risk-based regulations, and enhanced oversight, ensuring both victim protection and technological advancement.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17085967
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Liability for AI Decisions

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Legal Liability for AI Decisions

article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is now deeply embedded in decision-making processes across diverse fields such as healthcare, banking, transportation, and even judicial systems. While this integration has improved efficiency, it has also generated unprecedented legal challenges regarding liability when AI-driven decisions cause harm. Traditional liability frameworks, which rest on human fault or intent, are ill-suited to address autonomous and opaque AI systems. This paper examines the inadequacies of existing doctrines, surveys international approaches, and evaluates new proposals such as the European Union’s AI Liability Directive. It further explores theoretical models, debates on digital personhood, and the role of corporate governance. The study concludes that an effective legal regime for AI must balance innovation with accountability through strict liability mechanisms, risk-based regulations, and enhanced oversight, ensuring both victim protection and technological advancement.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Seva Mandir (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.