Dis/re/assembling comparative and international education: the polycrisis and the decolonial turn in a deglobalizing world

Purpose Based on decolonial literature, we argue that the field of comparative and international education(CIE) is a complex educational assemblage that both territorializes and deterritorializes at the same time, making it ready for decolonization and deglobalization. We highlight the importance of challenging Western-centric epistemologies, colonial legacies, and racial hierarchies that have historically influenced educational research, policies, and practices. It calls for integrating Indigenous ontologies, pluriversal approaches, and local epistemologies to create a more inclusive, relational, and decolonial view of education that acknowledges multiple histories and ways of knowing. Design/methodology/approach This is a conceptual study that uses decolonial literature to call for a cultural shift in comparative and international education. It emphasizes the importance of critically examining the colonial roots of the field, promoting participatory and Indigenous methodologies, and actively resisting colonial and racial capitalism influences to create a more equitable and decolonized future for global education. We advocate for a radical rethinking of CIE—shifting away from colonial, Eurocentric frameworks toward pluriversal, decolonial paradigms that emphasize local epistemologies, challenge racial and colonial hierarchies, and promote global justice. This transition demands critical reflection, innovative methodologies, and a dedication to amplifying marginalized voices, ultimately aiming to transform education into a space of resistance, diversity, and collective action emancipation. Findings We suggest that, given the current polycrisis, CIE needs to adopt a decolonial cultural turn that shifts the terms (concepts) and the content (histories) of modernity/coloniality and emphasizes bringing Indigenous knowledge(s) to the forefront onto-epistemologies centered in them. Decolonization in CIE also involves recognizing the interconnectedness of global crises—such as climate change, racial injustice, and economic inequality—and understanding how these are rooted in colonial and racial capitalist frameworks. We highlight that decolonial and deglobalization efforts must be linked, with a focus on resisting colonial structures and promoting a pluriversal, polycentric approach that honors multiple histories, ways of knowing, and cosmologies. This involves developing a “grammar of decolonization” that actively centers marginalized voices, deconstructs dominant narratives, and encourages collective, transformative change. Originality/value This article calls for the decolonization and deglobalization of the field of CIE.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of comparative education and development
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijced-01-2025-0007
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dis/re/assembling comparative and international education: the polycrisis and the decolonial turn in a deglobalizing world

International journal of comparative education and development
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
article

Dis/re/assembling comparative and international education: the polycrisis and the decolonial turn in a deglobalizing world

article en

Abstract

Purpose Based on decolonial literature, we argue that the field of comparative and international education(CIE) is a complex educational assemblage that both territorializes and deterritorializes at the same time, making it ready for decolonization and deglobalization. We highlight the importance of challenging Western-centric epistemologies, colonial legacies, and racial hierarchies that have historically influenced educational research, policies, and practices. It calls for integrating Indigenous ontologies, pluriversal approaches, and local epistemologies to create a more inclusive, relational, and decolonial view of education that acknowledges multiple histories and ways of knowing. Design/methodology/approach This is a conceptual study that uses decolonial literature to call for a cultural shift in comparative and international education. It emphasizes the importance of critically examining the colonial roots of the field, promoting participatory and Indigenous methodologies, and actively resisting colonial and racial capitalism influences to create a more equitable and decolonized future for global education. We advocate for a radical rethinking of CIE—shifting away from colonial, Eurocentric frameworks toward pluriversal, decolonial paradigms that emphasize local epistemologies, challenge racial and colonial hierarchies, and promote global justice. This transition demands critical reflection, innovative methodologies, and a dedication to amplifying marginalized voices, ultimately aiming to transform education into a space of resistance, diversity, and collective action emancipation. Findings We suggest that, given the current polycrisis, CIE needs to adopt a decolonial cultural turn that shifts the terms (concepts) and the content (histories) of modernity/coloniality and emphasizes bringing Indigenous knowledge(s) to the forefront onto-epistemologies centered in them. Decolonization in CIE also involves recognizing the interconnectedness of global crises—such as climate change, racial injustice, and economic inequality—and understanding how these are rooted in colonial and racial capitalist frameworks. We highlight that decolonial and deglobalization efforts must be linked, with a focus on resisting colonial structures and promoting a pluriversal, polycentric approach that honors multiple histories, ways of knowing, and cosmologies. This involves developing a “grammar of decolonization” that actively centers marginalized voices, deconstructs dominant narratives, and encourages collective, transformative change. Originality/value This article calls for the decolonization and deglobalization of the field of CIE.

International journal of comparative education and developmentVol. 27(3-4)
Dakota State University (US), Loyola University Chicago (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.