Deep Learning-Based Solar Irradiance Decomposition Models for Nordic Regions

This work presents a comparative evaluation of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models for solar irradiance decomposition in Nordic regions, where traditional empirical models often struggle. Using data from the Alpha Centauri outdoor test facility in Trondheim, Norway, the present work benchmarks the performance of Histogram-based Gradient Boosting (HGB), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks against the Erbs model. Results indicate that HGB performs best on the initial evaluation set, achieving strong R² scores for both DNI and DHI, while requiring minimal computational resources. However, in a zero-shot prediction scenario using independent data, HGB's performance drops significantly, suggesting overfitting to seasonal patterns. ANN maintains the highest accuracy for DNI decomposition, capturing nonlinear dependencies more effectively, whereas LSTM shows mixed results, particularly underperforming in DNI estimation.

Publication Details

Journal
EU PVSEC
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4229/eupvsec2025/4bv.3.8
Primary Topic
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning-Based Solar Irradiance Decomposition Models for Nordic Regions

EU PVSEC
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
article

Deep Learning-Based Solar Irradiance Decomposition Models for Nordic Regions

article en

Abstract

This work presents a comparative evaluation of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models for solar irradiance decomposition in Nordic regions, where traditional empirical models often struggle. Using data from the Alpha Centauri outdoor test facility in Trondheim, Norway, the present work benchmarks the performance of Histogram-based Gradient Boosting (HGB), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks against the Erbs model. Results indicate that HGB performs best on the initial evaluation set, achieving strong R² scores for both DNI and DHI, while requiring minimal computational resources. However, in a zero-shot prediction scenario using independent data, HGB's performance drops significantly, suggesting overfitting to seasonal patterns. ANN maintains the highest accuracy for DNI decomposition, capturing nonlinear dependencies more effectively, whereas LSTM shows mixed results, particularly underperforming in DNI estimation.

EU PVSEC
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.