Comprehensive evaluation of battery cooling mechanisms including two-phase immersion with 3 M™ NOVEC™-7000 and 7100

• Comprehensive comparison of all battery thermal management methods was performed. • Single- and two-phase immersion cooling reduced peak cell temperatures by 28 % and 42 %, respectively. • Porous media enhanced immersion cooling performance by an additional 15 % in peak temperature reduction. • Immersion cooling offers strong temperature uniformity but faces flow control and leakage risks. Effective thermal management is critical for ensuring the safety, performance, and lifespan of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), particularly in high-demand applications such as electric vehicles. This study presents a comparative experimental evaluation of five battery thermal management strategies—natural and forced air convection, cold plate cooling, and single-phase (3 M™ NOVEC™ 7100) and two-phase (3 M™ NOVEC™ 7000) immersion cooling, each tested without and with porous structures to enhance coolant distribution and boiling behaviour. A distinguishing feature of this work is the use of a realistic 24-cell (12S2P) battery pack, significantly larger than typical laboratory-scale tests, enabling a more practical assessment of intra-pack thermal gradients. Temperatures were recorded from seven spatially distributed locations to capture nonuniformities within the pack during operation. A key innovation is the integration of porous compression pads within immersion-cooled configurations. These structures enhance fluid transport, improve capillary liquid retention, and promote vapor venting, resulting in marked improvements in thermal uniformity. Among the methods tested, natural convection resulted in excessive peak temperatures (>60 °C) and poor distribution, while forced convection provided only marginal gains. Cold plates showed localized cooling but failed to address internal localised thermal gradients effectively. Single-phase immersion cooling with porous media improved uniformity but showed elevated surface temperatures due to limited conductive pathways through the porous layer. In contrast, two-phase immersion cooling, enhanced by latent heat effects and porous structures, achieved the lowest maximum temperatures (<36 °C) and the most uniform thermal profile. These findings establish two-phase immersion cooling with porous enhancement as a scalable, effective, and safety-oriented solution for next-generation battery systems, offering improved performance, lifespan, and integration potential for real-world applications.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120780
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive evaluation of battery cooling mechanisms including two-phase immersion with 3 M™ NOVEC™-7000 and 7100

2 citations
Energy Conversion and Management
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
1.37
article

Comprehensive evaluation of battery cooling mechanisms including two-phase immersion with 3 M™ NOVEC™-7000 and 7100

article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Comprehensive comparison of all battery thermal management methods was performed. • Single- and two-phase immersion cooling reduced peak cell temperatures by 28 % and 42 %, respectively. • Porous media enhanced immersion cooling performance by an additional 15 % in peak temperature reduction. • Immersion cooling offers strong temperature uniformity but faces flow control and leakage risks. Effective thermal management is critical for ensuring the safety, performance, and lifespan of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), particularly in high-demand applications such as electric vehicles. This study presents a comparative experimental evaluation of five battery thermal management strategies—natural and forced air convection, cold plate cooling, and single-phase (3 M™ NOVEC™ 7100) and two-phase (3 M™ NOVEC™ 7000) immersion cooling, each tested without and with porous structures to enhance coolant distribution and boiling behaviour. A distinguishing feature of this work is the use of a realistic 24-cell (12S2P) battery pack, significantly larger than typical laboratory-scale tests, enabling a more practical assessment of intra-pack thermal gradients. Temperatures were recorded from seven spatially distributed locations to capture nonuniformities within the pack during operation. A key innovation is the integration of porous compression pads within immersion-cooled configurations. These structures enhance fluid transport, improve capillary liquid retention, and promote vapor venting, resulting in marked improvements in thermal uniformity. Among the methods tested, natural convection resulted in excessive peak temperatures (>60 °C) and poor distribution, while forced convection provided only marginal gains. Cold plates showed localized cooling but failed to address internal localised thermal gradients effectively. Single-phase immersion cooling with porous media improved uniformity but showed elevated surface temperatures due to limited conductive pathways through the porous layer. In contrast, two-phase immersion cooling, enhanced by latent heat effects and porous structures, achieved the lowest maximum temperatures (<36 °C) and the most uniform thermal profile. These findings establish two-phase immersion cooling with porous enhancement as a scalable, effective, and safety-oriented solution for next-generation battery systems, offering improved performance, lifespan, and integration potential for real-world applications.

Energy Conversion and ManagementVol. 348
Sabancı Üniversitesi (TR), North Carolina State University (US), Small and Medium Enterprises Development Organization (TR), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.