Depression, Anxiety, Discrimination, and Stigma Across Candidate Patients for Bariatric Surgery

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of depression, anxiety, perceived discrimination, and weight stigma among bariatric surgery candidates. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from April to November 2024 at a tertiary care obesity treatment center using convenience sampling. Participants ( N = 210) completed validated tools, including the Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire, and a discrimination scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent group comparisons, correlation tests, and multivariate adjusted models. Results: The median age of participants was 39 years. Based on body mass index (BMI), patients were categorized into Group A (35–40, n = 75) and Group B (>40, n = 135). BMI was significantly associated with marital status ( p = 0.049) and education level ( p = 0.031). While 43.8% had no or minimal depression, 81.4% reported grade 2 anxiety. Group A showed significantly higher depression scores ( p = 0.012), whereas severe anxiety was more frequent in Group B. Moderate discrimination and mild stigma were commonly reported. Adjusted analyses revealed positive correlations between BMI and both discrimination (rs = 0.33, p < 0.001) and stigma (rs = 0.23, p = 0.007). Conclusion: Psychological distress and perceived stigma are prevalent in candidates for bariatric surgery. It is recommended to implement psychosocial screening and provide targeted psychological interventions to improve mental health and postoperative outcomes among them.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2168023x251400151
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Depression, Anxiety, Discrimination, and Stigma Across Candidate Patients for Bariatric Surgery

Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Depression, Anxiety, Discrimination, and Stigma Across Candidate Patients for Bariatric Surgery

article en

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of depression, anxiety, perceived discrimination, and weight stigma among bariatric surgery candidates. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from April to November 2024 at a tertiary care obesity treatment center using convenience sampling. Participants ( N = 210) completed validated tools, including the Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire, and a discrimination scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent group comparisons, correlation tests, and multivariate adjusted models. Results: The median age of participants was 39 years. Based on body mass index (BMI), patients were categorized into Group A (35–40, n = 75) and Group B (>40, n = 135). BMI was significantly associated with marital status ( p = 0.049) and education level ( p = 0.031). While 43.8% had no or minimal depression, 81.4% reported grade 2 anxiety. Group A showed significantly higher depression scores ( p = 0.012), whereas severe anxiety was more frequent in Group B. Moderate discrimination and mild stigma were commonly reported. Adjusted analyses revealed positive correlations between BMI and both discrimination (rs = 0.33, p < 0.001) and stigma (rs = 0.23, p = 0.007). Conclusion: Psychological distress and perceived stigma are prevalent in candidates for bariatric surgery. It is recommended to implement psychosocial screening and provide targeted psychological interventions to improve mental health and postoperative outcomes among them.

Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient CareVol. 21(2)
Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Depression, Anxiety, Discrimination, and Stigma Across Candidate Patients for Bariatric Surgery · Bariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Care (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS