KT4D Risks for the use of personal data and user profiling

The current EU approach to AI regulation faces several challenges and limitations that need to be addressed. One of the main issues is to what degree product legislation approach is fit for mitigating more systematic and democratic risks of AI systems and the lack of resources for regulatory and enforcement agencies. Another challenge is the compatibility of the EU approach with the collective bargaining and co-determination models that are prevalent in some member states. How can the EU ensure that workers are adequately involved in the governance of AI systems that affect their work environment and conditions? A third issue is the power relations and liability between the providers and the users of general-purpose AI systems. The EU approach seems to be unclear or reluctant to assign liability to the providers of AI systems, which may create an imbalance of power and responsibility between them and the users or deployers of the systems. Finally, the sustainability and material footprints of AI systems are arguably overlooked in the EU approach, despite it being a potentially important leverage point.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17671914
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

KT4D Risks for the use of personal data and user profiling

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

KT4D Risks for the use of personal data and user profiling

article en

Abstract

The current EU approach to AI regulation faces several challenges and limitations that need to be addressed. One of the main issues is to what degree product legislation approach is fit for mitigating more systematic and democratic risks of AI systems and the lack of resources for regulatory and enforcement agencies. Another challenge is the compatibility of the EU approach with the collective bargaining and co-determination models that are prevalent in some member states. How can the EU ensure that workers are adequately involved in the governance of AI systems that affect their work environment and conditions? A third issue is the power relations and liability between the providers and the users of general-purpose AI systems. The EU approach seems to be unclear or reluctant to assign liability to the providers of AI systems, which may create an imbalance of power and responsibility between them and the users or deployers of the systems. Finally, the sustainability and material footprints of AI systems are arguably overlooked in the EU approach, despite it being a potentially important leverage point.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Warwick (GB), Demos (GB), Demos Helsinki (FI), De Montfort University (GB)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.