An energy justice critique of small modular reactors in emerging nuclear transitions

The rise of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) presents a complex reflection point of technological promise and societal responsibility. There is increasing need to move beyond purely technical assessments of a future expanded deployment of SMRs. By incorporating frameworks of energy justice, we can better recognise that historical injustices and systemic inequalities intensify by inadequately planned nuclear transitions to modularity. Community engagement, transparency, and a commitment to addressing potential negative impacts on vulnerable populations are paramount in this new emerging field. Furthermore, considerations of property rights, resource distribution, and the potential displacement of communities should be addressed to foster acceptance and avoid replicating past failures. A just energy transition to SMRs requires a paradigm shift, moving from a model of top-down implementation to one that empowers local stakeholders and ensures that the benefits of SMR technology are distributed fairly, while mitigating risks and acknowledging the inherent complexities of nuclear energy's social license. Successful SMR implementation hinges on a rounded evaluation of social justice and long-term community well-being, fostering trust and navigating diverging regulatory frameworks.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104457
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Risk Perception and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An energy justice critique of small modular reactors in emerging nuclear transitions

1 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Risk Perception and Management
4.20
article

An energy justice critique of small modular reactors in emerging nuclear transitions

article en
1 citations

Abstract

The rise of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) presents a complex reflection point of technological promise and societal responsibility. There is increasing need to move beyond purely technical assessments of a future expanded deployment of SMRs. By incorporating frameworks of energy justice, we can better recognise that historical injustices and systemic inequalities intensify by inadequately planned nuclear transitions to modularity. Community engagement, transparency, and a commitment to addressing potential negative impacts on vulnerable populations are paramount in this new emerging field. Furthermore, considerations of property rights, resource distribution, and the potential displacement of communities should be addressed to foster acceptance and avoid replicating past failures. A just energy transition to SMRs requires a paradigm shift, moving from a model of top-down implementation to one that empowers local stakeholders and ensures that the benefits of SMR technology are distributed fairly, while mitigating risks and acknowledging the inherent complexities of nuclear energy's social license. Successful SMR implementation hinges on a rounded evaluation of social justice and long-term community well-being, fostering trust and navigating diverging regulatory frameworks.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 130
Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Risk Perception and Management
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.