“Return of Dependency” or “A New Hope”?: East-South Investment and Interdependent Development in Colombia

This dissertation develops an economic sociology of “post-dependent development” by examining the dynamics of “East–South” investment in Latin America, with a focus on Chinese multinational corporations (MNCs) in Colombia. Drawing on dependency theory and Peter Evans’ (1979) “dependent development”, it explores whether the rise of Chinese MNCs “going South” continues established dependency patterns or enables more equitable, “negotiated” development. Prevailing scholarship conceptualizes China merely as a new “core” country perpetuating North–South inequality. Challenging these narratives, this study centers on China’s own developmental challenges and distinctive state–firm relations to understand the diverse, evolving practices of Chinese MNCs on the ground. Methodologically, combining grounded theory and process tracing, and based on 64 interviews, ethnographic observations, and document analysis, it compares Chinese and U.S.-based MNCs in Colombia. Findings show that Chinese MNCs differ from their U.S.-based competitors in substantial ways. First, they enhance new dynamics of competition by investing in key sectors such as infrastructure, historically neglected by Northern actors. Second, although Chinese-led MNCs barely differ from their Northern counterparts in their attempts to circumvent legal loopholes when entering new markets, they demonstrate greater adaptability to local demands – particularly those of labor and local communities – over time, driven by state regulations and diplomatic priorities at home. The study concludes that, under strong democratic oversight, East–South engagement can support more negotiated development, though risks of elite capture persist where democratic institutions remain weak. On this basis, the dissertation offers nuanced insights into how “East–South” investment may indeed contribute to the vision of “post-dependent development” by complicating established paradigms of dependency.

Publication Details

Journal
DuEPublico (University of Duisburg-Essen)
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17185/duepublico/84272
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Return of Dependency” or “A New Hope”?: East-South Investment and Interdependent Development in Colombia

DuEPublico (University of Duisburg-Essen)
International Development and Aid
article

“Return of Dependency” or “A New Hope”?: East-South Investment and Interdependent Development in Colombia

article en

Abstract

This dissertation develops an economic sociology of “post-dependent development” by examining the dynamics of “East–South” investment in Latin America, with a focus on Chinese multinational corporations (MNCs) in Colombia. Drawing on dependency theory and Peter Evans’ (1979) “dependent development”, it explores whether the rise of Chinese MNCs “going South” continues established dependency patterns or enables more equitable, “negotiated” development. Prevailing scholarship conceptualizes China merely as a new “core” country perpetuating North–South inequality. Challenging these narratives, this study centers on China’s own developmental challenges and distinctive state–firm relations to understand the diverse, evolving practices of Chinese MNCs on the ground. Methodologically, combining grounded theory and process tracing, and based on 64 interviews, ethnographic observations, and document analysis, it compares Chinese and U.S.-based MNCs in Colombia. Findings show that Chinese MNCs differ from their U.S.-based competitors in substantial ways. First, they enhance new dynamics of competition by investing in key sectors such as infrastructure, historically neglected by Northern actors. Second, although Chinese-led MNCs barely differ from their Northern counterparts in their attempts to circumvent legal loopholes when entering new markets, they demonstrate greater adaptability to local demands – particularly those of labor and local communities – over time, driven by state regulations and diplomatic priorities at home. The study concludes that, under strong democratic oversight, East–South engagement can support more negotiated development, though risks of elite capture persist where democratic institutions remain weak. On this basis, the dissertation offers nuanced insights into how “East–South” investment may indeed contribute to the vision of “post-dependent development” by complicating established paradigms of dependency.

DuEPublico (University of Duisburg-Essen)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Return of Dependency” or “A New Hope”?: East-South Investment and Interdependent Development in Colombia · DuEPublico (University of Duisburg-Essen) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS