H2-rich syngas production from biowastes: Steam gasification and supercritical water gasification

The growing demand for renewable energy and cost-effective waste management has intensified interest in converting biowaste into fuels and chemicals with added value. Among thermochemical conversion methods, steam gasification and supercritical water gasification (SCWG) stand out as promising technologies for producing hydrogen-rich synthesis gas (syngas) from a wide variety of feedstocks. This review compares these two approaches in detail, emphasizing reaction mechanisms, operating parameters, and the role of feedstock properties. Factors such as temperature, residence time, steam or water ratio, and catalyst choice are examined with respect to their influence on gas composition, hydrogen yield, carbon conversion, and tar reduction. Recent progress in catalyst development is also highlighted. In addition, findings from life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) are synthesized to evaluate both environmental and economic feasibility. While steam gasification is particularly competitive for large-scale hydrogen and methanol production, SCWG is more effective for processing high-moisture feedstocks and offers stronger environmental benefits when integrated with carbon capture. The review concludes by identifying current challenges and outlining opportunities for advancing the commercial deployment of biowaste gasification technologies within the context of a circular bioeconomy and low-carbon hydrogen strategies. • Comparative evaluation of steam gasification and SCWG for hydrogen-rich syngas production from biowastes. • Steam gasification is technologically mature for dry biomass but limited by tar formation and energy-intensive drying. • SCWG converts wet biowastes directly with >95 % carbon conversion but faces high-T/P and long-term reactor safety challenges. • TEA and LCA indicate steam gasification is more economical, whereas SCWG offers greater sustainability with CO 2 capture. • Future priorities include catalyst stabilization, corrosion-resistant reactor materials, and hybrid system integration for scale-up.

Publication Details

Journal
Biomass and Bioenergy
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108648
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

H2-rich syngas production from biowastes: Steam gasification and supercritical water gasification

1 citations
Biomass and Bioenergy
Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
0.67
article

H2-rich syngas production from biowastes: Steam gasification and supercritical water gasification

article en
1 citations

Abstract

The growing demand for renewable energy and cost-effective waste management has intensified interest in converting biowaste into fuels and chemicals with added value. Among thermochemical conversion methods, steam gasification and supercritical water gasification (SCWG) stand out as promising technologies for producing hydrogen-rich synthesis gas (syngas) from a wide variety of feedstocks. This review compares these two approaches in detail, emphasizing reaction mechanisms, operating parameters, and the role of feedstock properties. Factors such as temperature, residence time, steam or water ratio, and catalyst choice are examined with respect to their influence on gas composition, hydrogen yield, carbon conversion, and tar reduction. Recent progress in catalyst development is also highlighted. In addition, findings from life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) are synthesized to evaluate both environmental and economic feasibility. While steam gasification is particularly competitive for large-scale hydrogen and methanol production, SCWG is more effective for processing high-moisture feedstocks and offers stronger environmental benefits when integrated with carbon capture. The review concludes by identifying current challenges and outlining opportunities for advancing the commercial deployment of biowaste gasification technologies within the context of a circular bioeconomy and low-carbon hydrogen strategies. • Comparative evaluation of steam gasification and SCWG for hydrogen-rich syngas production from biowastes. • Steam gasification is technologically mature for dry biomass but limited by tar formation and energy-intensive drying. • SCWG converts wet biowastes directly with >95 % carbon conversion but faces high-T/P and long-term reactor safety challenges. • TEA and LCA indicate steam gasification is more economical, whereas SCWG offers greater sustainability with CO 2 capture. • Future priorities include catalyst stabilization, corrosion-resistant reactor materials, and hybrid system integration for scale-up.

Biomass and BioenergyVol. 206
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.