Applications of Geographic Information Systems in Ecological Impact Assessment: A Methods Landscape, Practical Bottlenecks, and Future Pathways

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are central to spatial evidence in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). In this review, GIS is used in a broad, integrative sense to refer to an ecosystem of geospatial technologies—such as remote sensing (RS) and GPS—where GIS serves as the core platform for managing, analyzing, and communicating spatial data throughout the EIA process. GIS plays a crucial role at each stage of EIA, from baseline data collection to spatial analysis, ecological sensitivity mapping, impact prediction, scenario simulation, and landscape connectivity assessment. These capabilities support alternatives analysis, risk communication, and decision-making in EIA. This paper synthesizes thematic evidence and presents case studies to illustrate the synergies between GIS, remote sensing, GeoAI, and multisource data fusion. It highlights operational workflows and key deliverables for EIA applications, including urban expansion, transport corridors, and protected-area management. We identify persistent challenges in data quality and standardization, interoperability, model uncertainty, and policy gaps. To address them, we propose a minimum geospatial dataset with clear metadata standards, interpretable GeoAI paired with formal sensitivity analysis, IoT–GIS pipelines for real-time monitoring and adaptive management, and the systematic inclusion of cumulative effects and climate scenarios. By linking GIS methods to typical decision points and reporting standards in EIA, this review clarifies where GIS adds value, how to quantify and communicate uncertainty, and how to align analytical outputs with regulatory requirements and stakeholder expectations. The study offers a practical framework and implementation checklist for standardized, transparent, and reproducible EIA processes, contributing to evidence-based ecological governance.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su172210358
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applications of Geographic Information Systems in Ecological Impact Assessment: A Methods Landscape, Practical Bottlenecks, and Future Pathways

1 citations
Sustainability
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
2.42
article

Applications of Geographic Information Systems in Ecological Impact Assessment: A Methods Landscape, Practical Bottlenecks, and Future Pathways

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are central to spatial evidence in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). In this review, GIS is used in a broad, integrative sense to refer to an ecosystem of geospatial technologies—such as remote sensing (RS) and GPS—where GIS serves as the core platform for managing, analyzing, and communicating spatial data throughout the EIA process. GIS plays a crucial role at each stage of EIA, from baseline data collection to spatial analysis, ecological sensitivity mapping, impact prediction, scenario simulation, and landscape connectivity assessment. These capabilities support alternatives analysis, risk communication, and decision-making in EIA. This paper synthesizes thematic evidence and presents case studies to illustrate the synergies between GIS, remote sensing, GeoAI, and multisource data fusion. It highlights operational workflows and key deliverables for EIA applications, including urban expansion, transport corridors, and protected-area management. We identify persistent challenges in data quality and standardization, interoperability, model uncertainty, and policy gaps. To address them, we propose a minimum geospatial dataset with clear metadata standards, interpretable GeoAI paired with formal sensitivity analysis, IoT–GIS pipelines for real-time monitoring and adaptive management, and the systematic inclusion of cumulative effects and climate scenarios. By linking GIS methods to typical decision points and reporting standards in EIA, this review clarifies where GIS adds value, how to quantify and communicate uncertainty, and how to align analytical outputs with regulatory requirements and stakeholder expectations. The study offers a practical framework and implementation checklist for standardized, transparent, and reproducible EIA processes, contributing to evidence-based ecological governance.

SustainabilityVol. 17(22)
Harbin University (CN), Harbin Institute of Technology (CN), Jiangxi Province Forestry Survey Planning Institute (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.