Can (A)I help you? Comparing human and GenAI analysis of HCI qualitative research results

Generative AI (GenAI) is experiencing rapid growth, particularly in its application as a tool for qualitative text analysis—a key element of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research. This study examines the potential of GenAI, specifically ChatGPT, to assist in the analysis of qualitative research data. Four qualitative HCI studies, previously conducted and analyzed by our research group, were selected for this investigation. ChatGPT was employed to perform AI-assisted analyses on the raw data from these studies, and the AI-generated insights were then compared with the human-led analyses already completed. The results reveal significant alignment between the human and AI-assisted analyses, indicating that GenAI can serve as an effective support tool in qualitative research. However, while GenAI offers considerable advantages in enhancing research efficiency, human oversight remains crucial to ensuring accurate interpretation and contextual alignment. This study also provides practical recommendations for researchers interested in incorporating GenAI into their qualitative analysis processes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal on Interactive Systems
Published
2025-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5753/jis.2025.5416
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can (A)I help you? Comparing human and GenAI analysis of HCI qualitative research results

Journal on Interactive Systems
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
article

Can (A)I help you? Comparing human and GenAI analysis of HCI qualitative research results

article en

Abstract

Generative AI (GenAI) is experiencing rapid growth, particularly in its application as a tool for qualitative text analysis—a key element of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research. This study examines the potential of GenAI, specifically ChatGPT, to assist in the analysis of qualitative research data. Four qualitative HCI studies, previously conducted and analyzed by our research group, were selected for this investigation. ChatGPT was employed to perform AI-assisted analyses on the raw data from these studies, and the AI-generated insights were then compared with the human-led analyses already completed. The results reveal significant alignment between the human and AI-assisted analyses, indicating that GenAI can serve as an effective support tool in qualitative research. However, while GenAI offers considerable advantages in enhancing research efficiency, human oversight remains crucial to ensuring accurate interpretation and contextual alignment. This study also provides practical recommendations for researchers interested in incorporating GenAI into their qualitative analysis processes.

Journal on Interactive SystemsVol. 16(1)
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Instituto Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.