Mechanical behaviour and impact response of ultra-high-performance concrete incorporating steel and polypropylene fibers

This work delivers a head-to-head, dosage-resolved evaluation of steel fibers (SF) versus polypropylene fibers (PPF) in a UHPC matrix under repeated ACI-544 drop-weight impact, coupling fresh properties, non-destructive indices (density, UPV), static mechanics, and energy-based impact metrics (blows to first crack/failure, absorbed energy, toughness, ductility index). Fiber type and volume (0–1.5 %) were systematically varied at an interval of 0.5 %. Findings revealed that increasing dosage reduced flowability; SF enhanced density while UPV decreased with increasing fiber content. SF showed improvement in compressive and flexural strengths and the largest improvements in all impact parameters, markedly increasing blows to first crack/failure, energy absorption, toughness, and ductility. PPF slightly reduced compressive strength but enhanced flexural strength up to 1.5 % and improved impact ductility, offering a crack-arrest/weight-neutral option. The integrated dataset establishes novel links between NDT indices and impact capacity and provides dosage-response envelopes that distinguish when SF-reinforced UHPC (impact hardening) or PPF-reinforced UHPC (ductility/crack control) is preferable.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Next Materials
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.101436
Primary Topic
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanical behaviour and impact response of ultra-high-performance concrete incorporating steel and polypropylene fibers

Next Materials
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
article

Mechanical behaviour and impact response of ultra-high-performance concrete incorporating steel and polypropylene fibers

article en

Abstract

This work delivers a head-to-head, dosage-resolved evaluation of steel fibers (SF) versus polypropylene fibers (PPF) in a UHPC matrix under repeated ACI-544 drop-weight impact, coupling fresh properties, non-destructive indices (density, UPV), static mechanics, and energy-based impact metrics (blows to first crack/failure, absorbed energy, toughness, ductility index). Fiber type and volume (0–1.5 %) were systematically varied at an interval of 0.5 %. Findings revealed that increasing dosage reduced flowability; SF enhanced density while UPV decreased with increasing fiber content. SF showed improvement in compressive and flexural strengths and the largest improvements in all impact parameters, markedly increasing blows to first crack/failure, energy absorption, toughness, and ductility. PPF slightly reduced compressive strength but enhanced flexural strength up to 1.5 % and improved impact ductility, offering a crack-arrest/weight-neutral option. The integrated dataset establishes novel links between NDT indices and impact capacity and provides dosage-response envelopes that distinguish when SF-reinforced UHPC (impact hardening) or PPF-reinforced UHPC (ductility/crack control) is preferable.

Next MaterialsVol. 10
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.