Prognostic Value of a Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Ischemia Algorithm: Comparison Against Hybrid Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography/Positron Emission Tomography Imaging.

Background Artificial intelligence-guided quantitative computed tomography ischemia (AI-QCTischemia) is a novel machine-learning method for predicting myocardial ischemia from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). This observational cohort study aimed to compare the long-term prognostic value of AI-QCTischemia with hybrid CCTA/positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging in suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).Methods Symptomatic patients with suspected CAD underwent CCTA with selective downstream PET to detect ischemic CAD. Blinded reanalysis of CCTA images was done using the AI-QCTischemia algorithm, providing a binary result (normal versus abnormal).Results In the full analysis set (n=2271), hybrid CCTA/PET imaging was successful in 94% of the patients and AI-QCTischemia evaluation was feasible in 83%, resulting in a per-protocol set of 1772 patients (19% with ischemic CAD on hybrid CCTA/PET and 25% with abnormal AI-QCTischemia). There was moderate-to-substantial agreement between the methods (Cohen's κ=0.61). During a median follow-up of 7.0 years, 177 (10%) patients experienced the composite end point of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or unstable angina. Ischemic CAD on hybrid CCTA/PET was predictive of the composite end point (hazard ratio [HR], 2.35 [95% CI, 1.62-3.40]; P<0.001), after adjustment for clinical variables and early (6-month) myocardial revascularization. Similarly, an abnormal (ischemic) AI-QCTischemia result was independently predictive of adverse outcomes (adjusted HR, 1.98 [95% CI, 1.39-2.80]; P<0.001). The adjusted models, including either hybrid CCTA/PET or AI-QCTischemia, demonstrated similar discriminative ability (C-index 0.734 versus 0.729; P=0.53).Conclusions The AI-QCTischemia algorithm demonstrated long-term prognostic value comparable to hybrid CCTA/PET perfusion imaging in suspected CAD.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/92420
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Value of a Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Ischemia Algorithm: Comparison Against Hybrid Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography/Positron Emission Tomography Imaging.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Prognostic Value of a Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Ischemia Algorithm: Comparison Against Hybrid Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography/Positron Emission Tomography Imaging.

article en

Abstract

Background Artificial intelligence-guided quantitative computed tomography ischemia (AI-QCTischemia) is a novel machine-learning method for predicting myocardial ischemia from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). This observational cohort study aimed to compare the long-term prognostic value of AI-QCTischemia with hybrid CCTA/positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging in suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).Methods Symptomatic patients with suspected CAD underwent CCTA with selective downstream PET to detect ischemic CAD. Blinded reanalysis of CCTA images was done using the AI-QCTischemia algorithm, providing a binary result (normal versus abnormal).Results In the full analysis set (n=2271), hybrid CCTA/PET imaging was successful in 94% of the patients and AI-QCTischemia evaluation was feasible in 83%, resulting in a per-protocol set of 1772 patients (19% with ischemic CAD on hybrid CCTA/PET and 25% with abnormal AI-QCTischemia). There was moderate-to-substantial agreement between the methods (Cohen's κ=0.61). During a median follow-up of 7.0 years, 177 (10%) patients experienced the composite end point of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or unstable angina. Ischemic CAD on hybrid CCTA/PET was predictive of the composite end point (hazard ratio [HR], 2.35 [95% CI, 1.62-3.40]; P<0.001), after adjustment for clinical variables and early (6-month) myocardial revascularization. Similarly, an abnormal (ischemic) AI-QCTischemia result was independently predictive of adverse outcomes (adjusted HR, 1.98 [95% CI, 1.39-2.80]; P<0.001). The adjusted models, including either hybrid CCTA/PET or AI-QCTischemia, demonstrated similar discriminative ability (C-index 0.734 versus 0.729; P=0.53).Conclusions The AI-QCTischemia algorithm demonstrated long-term prognostic value comparable to hybrid CCTA/PET perfusion imaging in suspected CAD.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.