Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of the long-term likelihood of contralateral total hip arthroplasty.

Purpose Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed commonly for various end-stage diseases of the hip joint. However, the likelihood of a subsequent contralateral THA (cTHA) after primary unilateral index THA (iTHA) remains insufficiently defined, with reported rates of 13-29.1% after 5 years and 8.7-54% after 10 years of follow-up. This review aims to determine the long-term likelihood over time of cTHA after iTHA.Methods Systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis, including any clinical study published until July 2022, evaluating or documenting the likelihood over time of cTHA after iTHA, independently of the etiology. Excluded were cTHA within 12 months. A total of 21 studies, including 1,456,071 patients, who subsequently received 249,117 cTHA, were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed, weighting data on sample size, considering death as competing risk.Results At 5 years after iTHA, likelihood of cTHA was 17.8% (95% confidence interval 12.3-23.3%). At 10 years, this likelihood increased to 22.7% (16.1-29.4%), with a marginal subsequent increase. The likelihood increased slightly considering death as competing risk.Conclusion Nearly every fourth THA patient will require cTHA within 10 years. The likelihood of cTHA in this review appears to fall within the lower third of previously published ranges. However, most cTHA are required within the first years. Our findings suggest that the likelihood of requiring cTHA within the initial 10 years is approximately twice as high as the likelihood of requiring revision of the iTHA.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/92425
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of the long-term likelihood of contralateral total hip arthroplasty.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of the long-term likelihood of contralateral total hip arthroplasty.

article en

Abstract

Purpose Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed commonly for various end-stage diseases of the hip joint. However, the likelihood of a subsequent contralateral THA (cTHA) after primary unilateral index THA (iTHA) remains insufficiently defined, with reported rates of 13-29.1% after 5 years and 8.7-54% after 10 years of follow-up. This review aims to determine the long-term likelihood over time of cTHA after iTHA.Methods Systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis, including any clinical study published until July 2022, evaluating or documenting the likelihood over time of cTHA after iTHA, independently of the etiology. Excluded were cTHA within 12 months. A total of 21 studies, including 1,456,071 patients, who subsequently received 249,117 cTHA, were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed, weighting data on sample size, considering death as competing risk.Results At 5 years after iTHA, likelihood of cTHA was 17.8% (95% confidence interval 12.3-23.3%). At 10 years, this likelihood increased to 22.7% (16.1-29.4%), with a marginal subsequent increase. The likelihood increased slightly considering death as competing risk.Conclusion Nearly every fourth THA patient will require cTHA within 10 years. The likelihood of cTHA in this review appears to fall within the lower third of previously published ranges. However, most cTHA are required within the first years. Our findings suggest that the likelihood of requiring cTHA within the initial 10 years is approximately twice as high as the likelihood of requiring revision of the iTHA.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.