Self-Adhesive Resin Composites: Are they the Ultimate Bonding Solution?

Aim: To evaluate the bond strength of self-adhesive flowable composite (SAFC) with or without bonding application and compare it to that of conventional flowable composite. Subjects and Methods: A total of 15 extracted human premolars devoid of cavities were gathered. After the teeth were set individually in acrylic molds, the enamel was removed with a diamond disc and then dentin was flattened using silicon paper. The specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups: Group 1 was self-adhesive flowable composite without bonding, Group 2 was self-adhesive flowable composite with universal bonding agent application, and Group 3 was conventional flowable composite with universal bonding agent application. Two specimens were prepared on each tooth so that each group contains 10 specimens (n=10). Micro-shear bond strength was measured using universal testing machine, and mode of failure was assessed using stereomicroscope. Results: The mean value of Group 2 (18.66±8.21MPa) was significantly greater than that recorded in both Group 3 (10.43±5.39MPa) and Group 1 (4.38±3.69MPa). Conclusion: The bond strength to the dentin substrate was compromised when self-adhesive flowable composite was used alone without prior bonding agent application.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Dental Journal
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/adjc.2025.344323.1681
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-Adhesive Resin Composites: Are they the Ultimate Bonding Solution?

Advanced Dental Journal
Dental materials and restorations
article

Self-Adhesive Resin Composites: Are they the Ultimate Bonding Solution?

article en

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the bond strength of self-adhesive flowable composite (SAFC) with or without bonding application and compare it to that of conventional flowable composite. Subjects and Methods: A total of 15 extracted human premolars devoid of cavities were gathered. After the teeth were set individually in acrylic molds, the enamel was removed with a diamond disc and then dentin was flattened using silicon paper. The specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups: Group 1 was self-adhesive flowable composite without bonding, Group 2 was self-adhesive flowable composite with universal bonding agent application, and Group 3 was conventional flowable composite with universal bonding agent application. Two specimens were prepared on each tooth so that each group contains 10 specimens (n=10). Micro-shear bond strength was measured using universal testing machine, and mode of failure was assessed using stereomicroscope. Results: The mean value of Group 2 (18.66±8.21MPa) was significantly greater than that recorded in both Group 3 (10.43±5.39MPa) and Group 1 (4.38±3.69MPa). Conclusion: The bond strength to the dentin substrate was compromised when self-adhesive flowable composite was used alone without prior bonding agent application.

Advanced Dental JournalVol. 7(4)
Cairo University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.