Cognitive Warfare and AI-Driven Disinformation: Implications for Decision-Making in Hybrid Conflict Scenarios

In today’s security environment, characterized by hybrid threats and non-linear warfare, decision-makers increasingly face adversarial manipulation of information ecosystems. AI-driven cognitive warfare—leveraging tools such as deepfakes, large language models, and immersive synthetic environments—poses a substantial risk to rational decision-making, operational integrity, and societal resilience. These strategies aim to erode trust, exploit cognitive biases, and shape adversarial behaviors without direct kinetic engagement. This study examines the use of artificial intelligence in hostile information operations and the implications for military, political, and crisis-related decision-making under uncertainty. Drawing on case studies from the Russo-Ukrainian conflict and recent NATO research, the analysis highlights the psychological, ethical, and operational vulnerabilities exposed by AI-enabled disinformation campaigns. The paper proposes a strategic framework for resilience and suggests proactive mitigation strategies, including advanced training, counter-AI tools, and a multi-domain doctrine for information defense. The contribution argues that safeguarding cognitive sovereignty is critical to maintaining command effectiveness and national security in future conflict scenarios.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17571145
Primary Topic
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive Warfare and AI-Driven Disinformation: Implications for Decision-Making in Hybrid Conflict Scenarios

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
article

Cognitive Warfare and AI-Driven Disinformation: Implications for Decision-Making in Hybrid Conflict Scenarios

article en

Abstract

In today’s security environment, characterized by hybrid threats and non-linear warfare, decision-makers increasingly face adversarial manipulation of information ecosystems. AI-driven cognitive warfare—leveraging tools such as deepfakes, large language models, and immersive synthetic environments—poses a substantial risk to rational decision-making, operational integrity, and societal resilience. These strategies aim to erode trust, exploit cognitive biases, and shape adversarial behaviors without direct kinetic engagement. This study examines the use of artificial intelligence in hostile information operations and the implications for military, political, and crisis-related decision-making under uncertainty. Drawing on case studies from the Russo-Ukrainian conflict and recent NATO research, the analysis highlights the psychological, ethical, and operational vulnerabilities exposed by AI-enabled disinformation campaigns. The paper proposes a strategic framework for resilience and suggests proactive mitigation strategies, including advanced training, counter-AI tools, and a multi-domain doctrine for information defense. The contribution argues that safeguarding cognitive sovereignty is critical to maintaining command effectiveness and national security in future conflict scenarios.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT), Centro de Estudios Científicos (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.