Influence of Pushing Versus Holding Isometric Exercises at Different Joint Angles on Hamstring-Quadriceps Strength Ratio and Functional Performance: A Time-Under-Tension Approach to Injury Risk Reduction

Abstract Background: The hamstring-to-quadriceps (H:Q) strength ratio is a critical determinant of knee stability, functional performance, and injury prevention. Optimizing this ratio is essential for reducing injury risk, particularly among athletes and physically active individuals. Isometric training, characterized by pushing and holding exercises, is commonly used to enhance strength. However, the comparative effects of these two methods at different joint angles, particularly within the framework of time under tension (TUT), remain underexplored. Objective: To compare the effects of pushing versus holding isometric exercises at varying knee joint angles on H:Q strength ratio, functional performance, time under tension (TUT), and perceived exertion among recreational athletes. Methods: Thirty participants were randomly allocated into two groups—pushing or holding isometrics—and trained for six weeks using a time-under-tension protocol. Pre- and post intervention assessments included the H:Q ratio (via hand-held dynamometry), Single-Leg Hop Test, Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), TUT, and Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE). Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in H:Q ratio, hop performance, and SEBT scores (p < 0.05). The pushing group showed greater gains in H:Q ratio and hop distance, while the holding group exhibited longer TUT and enhanced balance control. RPE scores were higher in the pushing group, indicating greater exertion demands. Conclusion: Both pushing and holding isometric protocols effectively enhanced lower limb strength and function. Pushing isometrics were more effective for improving the H:Q ratio and explosive performance, whereas holding isometrics better enhanced dynamic balance and muscular endurance. Incorporating joint angle–specific isometric training may serve as a strategic tool for tailored rehabilitation and injury prevention.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17614026
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Pushing Versus Holding Isometric Exercises at Different Joint Angles on Hamstring-Quadriceps Strength Ratio and Functional Performance: A Time-Under-Tension Approach to Injury Risk Reduction

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sports injuries and prevention
article

Influence of Pushing Versus Holding Isometric Exercises at Different Joint Angles on Hamstring-Quadriceps Strength Ratio and Functional Performance: A Time-Under-Tension Approach to Injury Risk Reduction

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: The hamstring-to-quadriceps (H:Q) strength ratio is a critical determinant of knee stability, functional performance, and injury prevention. Optimizing this ratio is essential for reducing injury risk, particularly among athletes and physically active individuals. Isometric training, characterized by pushing and holding exercises, is commonly used to enhance strength. However, the comparative effects of these two methods at different joint angles, particularly within the framework of time under tension (TUT), remain underexplored. Objective: To compare the effects of pushing versus holding isometric exercises at varying knee joint angles on H:Q strength ratio, functional performance, time under tension (TUT), and perceived exertion among recreational athletes. Methods: Thirty participants were randomly allocated into two groups—pushing or holding isometrics—and trained for six weeks using a time-under-tension protocol. Pre- and post intervention assessments included the H:Q ratio (via hand-held dynamometry), Single-Leg Hop Test, Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), TUT, and Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE). Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in H:Q ratio, hop performance, and SEBT scores (p < 0.05). The pushing group showed greater gains in H:Q ratio and hop distance, while the holding group exhibited longer TUT and enhanced balance control. RPE scores were higher in the pushing group, indicating greater exertion demands. Conclusion: Both pushing and holding isometric protocols effectively enhanced lower limb strength and function. Pushing isometrics were more effective for improving the H:Q ratio and explosive performance, whereas holding isometrics better enhanced dynamic balance and muscular endurance. Incorporating joint angle–specific isometric training may serve as a strategic tool for tailored rehabilitation and injury prevention.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN), Sri Venkateswara University (IN), Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Sports injuries and prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.