Understanding Overfitting in AI and its impact on Cybersecurity

Artificial intelligence is becoming an essential part of cybersecurity, but its advantages are not reaching everyone equally. This paper investigates the problem of overfitting in AI security systems, which happens when models learn too much from past data and fail to recognize new or evolving threats. Using a comparative case study approach, we analyze events like the 2017 WannaCry ransomware outbreak and examine how both large technology firms and public sector organizations respond to these challenges. Our findings show that overfitting is not just a technical flaw but is shaped by decisions about resources, maintenance, and access to expertise. Organizations with more funding and technical capacity are able to keep their AI models current and effective, while smaller and less resourced groups often rely on outdated systems that leave them exposed to attacks. This pattern raises concerns about growing inequality in digital security. The study concludes that addressing overfitting requires not only better technical solutions but also policy changes and industry standards that support fairness, transparency, and adaptability. By making advanced cybersecurity tools more accessible and focusing on ongoing improvement, we can help ensure that digital protection is available to all organizations, not just the privileged few.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17617265
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Overfitting in AI and its impact on Cybersecurity

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Information and Cyber Security
article

Understanding Overfitting in AI and its impact on Cybersecurity

article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is becoming an essential part of cybersecurity, but its advantages are not reaching everyone equally. This paper investigates the problem of overfitting in AI security systems, which happens when models learn too much from past data and fail to recognize new or evolving threats. Using a comparative case study approach, we analyze events like the 2017 WannaCry ransomware outbreak and examine how both large technology firms and public sector organizations respond to these challenges. Our findings show that overfitting is not just a technical flaw but is shaped by decisions about resources, maintenance, and access to expertise. Organizations with more funding and technical capacity are able to keep their AI models current and effective, while smaller and less resourced groups often rely on outdated systems that leave them exposed to attacks. This pattern raises concerns about growing inequality in digital security. The study concludes that addressing overfitting requires not only better technical solutions but also policy changes and industry standards that support fairness, transparency, and adaptability. By making advanced cybersecurity tools more accessible and focusing on ongoing improvement, we can help ensure that digital protection is available to all organizations, not just the privileged few.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Columbia Southern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Information and Cyber Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.