Risk factors for restenosis after coronary angioplasty

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the gold standard regarding the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. PCI has proven superior to fibrinolysis in reducing mortality, reinfarction, and stroke rates, provided recommended time-lapses are achievable. However, like any medical procedure, there is room for failure, known as restenosis in the case of non-stent strategy and in-stent restenosis (ISR) in the case of stent-dependent strategies. Nearly 10% of all PCI develop ISR, most commonly treated with another intervention. Several risk factors have been reported across the literature to identify which patients are the most likely to develop this complication. Proper risk management can lead to the prevention of this complication; therefore, it is imperative for physicians to accurately identify relevant risk factors that have enough evidence backing their impact. This review aims to identify the most relevant quantifiable risk factors for ISR to analyze their contribution to the incidence of this complication.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17617017
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk factors for restenosis after coronary angioplasty

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Risk factors for restenosis after coronary angioplasty

article en

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the gold standard regarding the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. PCI has proven superior to fibrinolysis in reducing mortality, reinfarction, and stroke rates, provided recommended time-lapses are achievable. However, like any medical procedure, there is room for failure, known as restenosis in the case of non-stent strategy and in-stent restenosis (ISR) in the case of stent-dependent strategies. Nearly 10% of all PCI develop ISR, most commonly treated with another intervention. Several risk factors have been reported across the literature to identify which patients are the most likely to develop this complication. Proper risk management can lead to the prevention of this complication; therefore, it is imperative for physicians to accurately identify relevant risk factors that have enough evidence backing their impact. This review aims to identify the most relevant quantifiable risk factors for ISR to analyze their contribution to the incidence of this complication.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad Católica de Cuenca (EC), Universidad Estatal de Bolívar (EC), Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Ecuador (EC)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.