Development and validation of a tobacco testing laboratories assessment tool

Effective regulation and control of tobacco products require robust laboratory testing capabilities to ensure quality, safety and compliance with relevant standards. Currently, no standardized assessment tool exists globally to evaluate the tobacco testing laboratories. This study aims to address this gap by developing the Tobacco Testing Laboratory Assessment Tool (TTLAT). This tool aligns with the WHO-FCTC on Tobacco Control’s Article 9, which calls for the adoption and implementation of effective testing, measuring, and regulation measures Methodology The TTLAT was developed through a systematic literature review and a two-round Delphi technique involving 24 experts. The tool was then validated in four National Tobacco Testing Laboratories in India. Content validity was assessed using the Item-Content Validity Index (I-CVI) and Scale-Content Validity Index (S-CVI). Construct validity was evaluated through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency reliability was measured using Cronbach’s alpha. Results The final TTLAT comprises 213 items across 11 critical domains including General Information (17), Documents (37), Organization and Management (10), Human Resources (28), Infrastructure (7), Equipment (23), Consumables and Reagents (10), Sample Handling (17), Tobacco Product Analytes (8), Data Management (36), and Biosafety and Biosecurity (20). Content validity analysis showed excellent results. Exploratory factor analysis identified six factors accounting for 52.5% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good model fit (CFI = 0.91; TLI = 0.90; RMSEA = 0.05; SRMR = 0.06). The tool showed high internal consistency reliability across factors (Cronbach’s alpha 0.72–0.92). Conclusion The TTLAT demonstrates strong psychometric properties and provides a comprehensive, standardised approach for assessing tobacco testing laboratory capacity

Publication Details

Journal
University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34961/18938
Primary Topic
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a tobacco testing laboratories assessment tool

University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
article

Development and validation of a tobacco testing laboratories assessment tool

article en

Abstract

Effective regulation and control of tobacco products require robust laboratory testing capabilities to ensure quality, safety and compliance with relevant standards. Currently, no standardized assessment tool exists globally to evaluate the tobacco testing laboratories. This study aims to address this gap by developing the Tobacco Testing Laboratory Assessment Tool (TTLAT). This tool aligns with the WHO-FCTC on Tobacco Control’s Article 9, which calls for the adoption and implementation of effective testing, measuring, and regulation measures Methodology The TTLAT was developed through a systematic literature review and a two-round Delphi technique involving 24 experts. The tool was then validated in four National Tobacco Testing Laboratories in India. Content validity was assessed using the Item-Content Validity Index (I-CVI) and Scale-Content Validity Index (S-CVI). Construct validity was evaluated through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Internal consistency reliability was measured using Cronbach’s alpha. Results The final TTLAT comprises 213 items across 11 critical domains including General Information (17), Documents (37), Organization and Management (10), Human Resources (28), Infrastructure (7), Equipment (23), Consumables and Reagents (10), Sample Handling (17), Tobacco Product Analytes (8), Data Management (36), and Biosafety and Biosecurity (20). Content validity analysis showed excellent results. Exploratory factor analysis identified six factors accounting for 52.5% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good model fit (CFI = 0.91; TLI = 0.90; RMSEA = 0.05; SRMR = 0.06). The tool showed high internal consistency reliability across factors (Cronbach’s alpha 0.72–0.92). Conclusion The TTLAT demonstrates strong psychometric properties and provides a comprehensive, standardised approach for assessing tobacco testing laboratory capacity

University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.