Techno-economic feasibility of centralized and decentralized ammonia production in the United States

Ammonia is a cornerstone of modern agriculture, supplying the nitrogen essential for crops that nourish nearly half the global population. Yet its production is responsible for ∼2 % of global greenhouse gas emissions. To meet climate and food security goals, sustainable, low-carbon, and resilient ammonia production systems are needed. Here, we develop a spatially explicit techno-economic model to compare centralized and decentralized ammonia production pathways across the U.S., a major global ammonia producer and consumer, spanning the full supply chain from hydrogen production to fertilizer delivery. We integrate high-resolution supply and demand data and apply linear optimization to estimate delivered ammonia costs, accounting for geographic mismatches and transportation. Our results show that decentralized ammonia production, whether powered by grid electricity or solar energy, is substantially more expensive than centralized production from natural gas or coal. Centralized natural gas-based ammonia has a median production cost of 326 USD/tonne NH 3 , compared to 499 USD/tonne for coal. Decentralized grid-powered systems range from 659 to 1634 USD/tonne, and solar-powered systems from 1077 to 2266 USD/tonne. Transportation costs for centralized production range from 7 to 85 USD/tonne, with a median of 40 USD/tonne, resulting in a delivered cost of 343 USD/tonne. Median delivered costs for decentralized grid- and solar-powered systems are 1069 and 1494 USD/tonne, respectively. Decentralized systems require electricity prices below 19 USD/MWh (grid) and 17 USD/MWh (solar) to achieve cost parity, well below 2024 U S. averages of 117 USD/MWh. These results highlight the economic challenges facing decentralized ammonia production and the importance of electricity cost reductions, tax credits, carbon pricing, or further technological breakthroughs for broader viability. • Spatial model compares centralized vs. decentralized ammonia in the U.S. • Transportation adds ∼40 USD/tonne to centralized ammonia delivery costs. • Centralized fossil-based ammonia remains cheaper despite transport costs. • Decentralized systems need electricity below 19 USD/MWh for cost parity. • Decentralized ammonia may boost resilience in fuel- or import-limited areas.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Published
2025-11-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116486
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Techno-economic feasibility of centralized and decentralized ammonia production in the United States

4 citations
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
1.56
article

Techno-economic feasibility of centralized and decentralized ammonia production in the United States

article en
4 citations

Abstract

Ammonia is a cornerstone of modern agriculture, supplying the nitrogen essential for crops that nourish nearly half the global population. Yet its production is responsible for ∼2 % of global greenhouse gas emissions. To meet climate and food security goals, sustainable, low-carbon, and resilient ammonia production systems are needed. Here, we develop a spatially explicit techno-economic model to compare centralized and decentralized ammonia production pathways across the U.S., a major global ammonia producer and consumer, spanning the full supply chain from hydrogen production to fertilizer delivery. We integrate high-resolution supply and demand data and apply linear optimization to estimate delivered ammonia costs, accounting for geographic mismatches and transportation. Our results show that decentralized ammonia production, whether powered by grid electricity or solar energy, is substantially more expensive than centralized production from natural gas or coal. Centralized natural gas-based ammonia has a median production cost of 326 USD/tonne NH 3 , compared to 499 USD/tonne for coal. Decentralized grid-powered systems range from 659 to 1634 USD/tonne, and solar-powered systems from 1077 to 2266 USD/tonne. Transportation costs for centralized production range from 7 to 85 USD/tonne, with a median of 40 USD/tonne, resulting in a delivered cost of 343 USD/tonne. Median delivered costs for decentralized grid- and solar-powered systems are 1069 and 1494 USD/tonne, respectively. Decentralized systems require electricity prices below 19 USD/MWh (grid) and 17 USD/MWh (solar) to achieve cost parity, well below 2024 U S. averages of 117 USD/MWh. These results highlight the economic challenges facing decentralized ammonia production and the importance of electricity cost reductions, tax credits, carbon pricing, or further technological breakthroughs for broader viability. • Spatial model compares centralized vs. decentralized ammonia in the U.S. • Transportation adds ∼40 USD/tonne to centralized ammonia delivery costs. • Centralized fossil-based ammonia remains cheaper despite transport costs. • Decentralized systems need electricity below 19 USD/MWh for cost parity. • Decentralized ammonia may boost resilience in fuel- or import-limited areas.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVol. 226
Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
1.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.