Predicting the Influence of Input Structure, Sequence, and Architecture on Neural Network Representations

This research investigates how three rarely unified factors—the internal structure of the data, the sequence in which inputs are presented, and the inductive biases of a neural network's architecture—jointly determine the range of representations a model is likely to learn during training. Rather than assuming neural networks converge to a single predictable solution, this work demonstrates that different combinations of these factors guide models into distinct, stable “representational basins.” To evaluate this hypothesis, we constructed controlled synthetic datasets with configurable structure, multiple curriculum-like input sequences, and three different neural architectures (MLP, CNN, Transformer). Each condition was independently trained, and the resulting hidden-layer representations were analyzed using PCA visualizations, CKA similarity, cosine similarity, and variance correlation metrics. A shared test dataset ensures that comparisons reflect true differences in learned internal geometry, rather than superficial sampling variance. The findings show clear, measurable evidence that: Data structure strongly shapes the geometry of learned feature spaces, Input ordering meaningfully anchors early gradient directions, shifting representational outcomes, Architectural bias interacts with both of the above to define the representational range accessible to a model. The accompanying codebase runs all 27 experimental conditions automatically, saves PCA plots, computes all similarity measures, and exports a full CSV of results. This makes the research fully reproducible and transparent. This work contributes a practical framework for understanding and predicting how models internalize data, offering implications for interpretability, curriculum design, and data-centric model development. Files Included: Full research paper (PDF) Complete experiment pipeline (Python) PCA plots of learned representations Representation similarity CSV (CKA, cosine, variance) Synthetic dataset generation code

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17617613
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting the Influence of Input Structure, Sequence, and Architecture on Neural Network Representations

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Predicting the Influence of Input Structure, Sequence, and Architecture on Neural Network Representations

article en

Abstract

This research investigates how three rarely unified factors—the internal structure of the data, the sequence in which inputs are presented, and the inductive biases of a neural network's architecture—jointly determine the range of representations a model is likely to learn during training. Rather than assuming neural networks converge to a single predictable solution, this work demonstrates that different combinations of these factors guide models into distinct, stable “representational basins.” To evaluate this hypothesis, we constructed controlled synthetic datasets with configurable structure, multiple curriculum-like input sequences, and three different neural architectures (MLP, CNN, Transformer). Each condition was independently trained, and the resulting hidden-layer representations were analyzed using PCA visualizations, CKA similarity, cosine similarity, and variance correlation metrics. A shared test dataset ensures that comparisons reflect true differences in learned internal geometry, rather than superficial sampling variance. The findings show clear, measurable evidence that: Data structure strongly shapes the geometry of learned feature spaces, Input ordering meaningfully anchors early gradient directions, shifting representational outcomes, Architectural bias interacts with both of the above to define the representational range accessible to a model. The accompanying codebase runs all 27 experimental conditions automatically, saves PCA plots, computes all similarity measures, and exports a full CSV of results. This makes the research fully reproducible and transparent. This work contributes a practical framework for understanding and predicting how models internalize data, offering implications for interpretability, curriculum design, and data-centric model development. Files Included: Full research paper (PDF) Complete experiment pipeline (Python) PCA plots of learned representations Representation similarity CSV (CKA, cosine, variance) Synthetic dataset generation code

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.