EVALUATING SOIL HEALTH THROUGH NEMATODE ECOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SOIL NEMATODE POPULATIONS IN CONVENTIONAL, ORGANIC, AND BIODYNAMIC VINEYARDS.

Soil nematodes occupy multiple trophic levels within the soil food web and are increasingly recognized as sensitive bioindicators of soil health and ecosystem function; however, their use in perennial systems such as viticulture remains underutilized. This study evaluated the effects of conventional, organic, and biodynamic vineyard management practices on nematode community structure, soil food web stability, and biological resilience across 17 vineyards in Massachusetts, New York, and Vermont. In total, 28,602 nematodes were manually extracted, identified, and assigned to 21 distinct families spanning bacterivores, fungivores, herbivores, omnivores, and predators. Soil food web indices, including the Maturity Index (MI) and Plant-Parasitic Index (PPI), were calculated to assess ecological conditions. Results showed that organic and biodynamic systems consistently supported higher MI values and more balanced PPI scores compared to conventional systems, indicating greater soil stability and reduced disturbance. Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) identified organic fungicide use as a positive predictor of MI, while synthetic insecticides and mowing practices were associated with reductions in PPI, suggesting management-driven shifts in nematode functional composition. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) further differentiated nematode community patterns based on management type and vineyard age, revealing a successional trajectory toward greater food web complexity in older sites that were organically and biodynamically managed. Methodological rigor was maintained through the reprocessing and cross-validation of 10% of samples, ensuring high taxonomic consistency and data reliability. The scale and depth of this work represent one of the most comprehensive nematode-based assessments of vineyard soil health in the northeastern United States. These findings highlight the critical role of ecological management in fostering soil biological diversity and resilience. Moreover, they demonstrate that nematode community analysis provides a cost-effective and ecologically meaningful tool for monitoring soil health and informing sustainable agricultural practices in vineyard systems.

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst)
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7275/17tj-qj84
Primary Topic
Nematode management and characterization studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVALUATING SOIL HEALTH THROUGH NEMATODE ECOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SOIL NEMATODE POPULATIONS IN CONVENTIONAL, ORGANIC, AND BIODYNAMIC VINEYARDS.

ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst)
Nematode management and characterization studies
article

EVALUATING SOIL HEALTH THROUGH NEMATODE ECOLOGY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SOIL NEMATODE POPULATIONS IN CONVENTIONAL, ORGANIC, AND BIODYNAMIC VINEYARDS.

article en

Abstract

Soil nematodes occupy multiple trophic levels within the soil food web and are increasingly recognized as sensitive bioindicators of soil health and ecosystem function; however, their use in perennial systems such as viticulture remains underutilized. This study evaluated the effects of conventional, organic, and biodynamic vineyard management practices on nematode community structure, soil food web stability, and biological resilience across 17 vineyards in Massachusetts, New York, and Vermont. In total, 28,602 nematodes were manually extracted, identified, and assigned to 21 distinct families spanning bacterivores, fungivores, herbivores, omnivores, and predators. Soil food web indices, including the Maturity Index (MI) and Plant-Parasitic Index (PPI), were calculated to assess ecological conditions. Results showed that organic and biodynamic systems consistently supported higher MI values and more balanced PPI scores compared to conventional systems, indicating greater soil stability and reduced disturbance. Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) identified organic fungicide use as a positive predictor of MI, while synthetic insecticides and mowing practices were associated with reductions in PPI, suggesting management-driven shifts in nematode functional composition. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) further differentiated nematode community patterns based on management type and vineyard age, revealing a successional trajectory toward greater food web complexity in older sites that were organically and biodynamically managed. Methodological rigor was maintained through the reprocessing and cross-validation of 10% of samples, ensuring high taxonomic consistency and data reliability. The scale and depth of this work represent one of the most comprehensive nematode-based assessments of vineyard soil health in the northeastern United States. These findings highlight the critical role of ecological management in fostering soil biological diversity and resilience. Moreover, they demonstrate that nematode community analysis provides a cost-effective and ecologically meaningful tool for monitoring soil health and informing sustainable agricultural practices in vineyard systems.

ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Nematode management and characterization studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.