Strategies and attributes of scientists for public engagement with climate change

Public engagement by scientists has become imperative across the science-policy interface. Today, there are increasing calls for scientists to engage communities and policymakers as a pathway to incorporate social pluralism, many ways of knowing, and producing usable knowledge. Yet, there is a limited understanding of the strategies and attributes that can help scientists interact with other distinct publics in two-way conversations on a pressing issue such as climate change. Here, we examined via 28 semi-structured qualitative interviews, strategies and personal attributes of scientists and their practices that offer a pathway to transforming public engagement under climate change. We found that scientists use seven strategies and six personal attributes to engage distinct publics in two-way dialog and active and deep discussions on climate change. These strategies require scientists to foster connection with others, engage the public from the beginning, create safe spaces for dialogue, provide summaries for discussions, go beyond arms-length approaches, understand the context, and approach engagement as a partnership . The strategies also draw on attributes related to being open-minded and resilient, knowing your competencies and audiences, practicing reflexivity, and respecting alternative viewpoints . These findings and insights have implications for how scientists engage distinct publics in two-way dialogue by offering an evidence base to support practice change. They form a first step in informing the ability of scientists to navigate differences across settings and with questions of power and politics.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Policy
Published
2025-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106958
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies and attributes of scientists for public engagement with climate change

Marine Policy
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Strategies and attributes of scientists for public engagement with climate change

article en

Abstract

Public engagement by scientists has become imperative across the science-policy interface. Today, there are increasing calls for scientists to engage communities and policymakers as a pathway to incorporate social pluralism, many ways of knowing, and producing usable knowledge. Yet, there is a limited understanding of the strategies and attributes that can help scientists interact with other distinct publics in two-way conversations on a pressing issue such as climate change. Here, we examined via 28 semi-structured qualitative interviews, strategies and personal attributes of scientists and their practices that offer a pathway to transforming public engagement under climate change. We found that scientists use seven strategies and six personal attributes to engage distinct publics in two-way dialog and active and deep discussions on climate change. These strategies require scientists to foster connection with others, engage the public from the beginning, create safe spaces for dialogue, provide summaries for discussions, go beyond arms-length approaches, understand the context, and approach engagement as a partnership . The strategies also draw on attributes related to being open-minded and resilient, knowing your competencies and audiences, practicing reflexivity, and respecting alternative viewpoints . These findings and insights have implications for how scientists engage distinct publics in two-way dialogue by offering an evidence base to support practice change. They form a first step in informing the ability of scientists to navigate differences across settings and with questions of power and politics.

Marine PolicyVol. 184
University of Tasmania (AU), Centre for Marine Socioecology (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.