Accreditation practices for joint degree and short-term training programmes

This paper synthesises seven best practices for accreditation in joint degree and short-term training programmes, reflecting the experiences of European Digital Europe Programme (DEP) projects, as expressed in the context of the LEADSx2030 thematic sub-cluster. The work recognises the significant barriers caused by fragmented national and institutional regulatory frameworks and presents pragmatic solutions aimed at promoting innovation and quality in European higher education and lifelong learning. The seven good practices are mapped across three core dimensions: (1) Joint degree programme accreditation, (2) alternative forms of certification for emerging learning programmes, such as microcredentials and digital badges, and (3) system-level and national initiatives supporting more flexible recognition models. For joint programmes, the European Approach enables external quality assurance and mutual recognition by multiple countries, reducing administrative overhead. However, its partial or absent implementation at national levels means projects often must blend this with sequential, country-level accreditations - sometimes limiting joint awarding of degrees. Short term and modular learning, including microcredentials, is rising in importance. New methodologies for compliance assessment and peer-reviewed quality assurance, exemplified by the EURIDICE Microcredential Board, are enabling robust, light-weight certification for both academic and non-academic providers. Pilot efforts illustrate how these microcredentials can be aligned with EU recommendations while maintaining trust and educational autonomy. Likewise, industry-led ecosystems, such as Ireland’s Skillnet, are showcased for agile, real-time skilling responses and for integrating modular, stackable learning with recognised national quality frameworks. The paper identifies institutional accreditation systems (e.g., EQUIS) as foundational for cross-sector and cross-border permeability, supporting upskilling and future-proofing the workforce. Systemic recommendations include the need to accelerate the uptake of joint accreditation at the European level, expand mechanisms for mutual recognition of short courses and microcredentials, and build strong quality assurance that is transparent, scalable, and adaptable to emerging skill needs. In conclusion, the collective DEP project experience finds that a blend of European, national, and stakeholder-driven accreditation solutions is essential. These solutions should be supported by modular, interoperable learning pathways and a supranational quality assurance logic, enabling learners and institutions across Europe to benefit from flexible, high-quality education portfolios that serve both lifelong learning and labour market transformation.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17607995
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accreditation practices for joint degree and short-term training programmes

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Accreditation practices for joint degree and short-term training programmes

article en

Abstract

This paper synthesises seven best practices for accreditation in joint degree and short-term training programmes, reflecting the experiences of European Digital Europe Programme (DEP) projects, as expressed in the context of the LEADSx2030 thematic sub-cluster. The work recognises the significant barriers caused by fragmented national and institutional regulatory frameworks and presents pragmatic solutions aimed at promoting innovation and quality in European higher education and lifelong learning. The seven good practices are mapped across three core dimensions: (1) Joint degree programme accreditation, (2) alternative forms of certification for emerging learning programmes, such as microcredentials and digital badges, and (3) system-level and national initiatives supporting more flexible recognition models. For joint programmes, the European Approach enables external quality assurance and mutual recognition by multiple countries, reducing administrative overhead. However, its partial or absent implementation at national levels means projects often must blend this with sequential, country-level accreditations - sometimes limiting joint awarding of degrees. Short term and modular learning, including microcredentials, is rising in importance. New methodologies for compliance assessment and peer-reviewed quality assurance, exemplified by the EURIDICE Microcredential Board, are enabling robust, light-weight certification for both academic and non-academic providers. Pilot efforts illustrate how these microcredentials can be aligned with EU recommendations while maintaining trust and educational autonomy. Likewise, industry-led ecosystems, such as Ireland’s Skillnet, are showcased for agile, real-time skilling responses and for integrating modular, stackable learning with recognised national quality frameworks. The paper identifies institutional accreditation systems (e.g., EQUIS) as foundational for cross-sector and cross-border permeability, supporting upskilling and future-proofing the workforce. Systemic recommendations include the need to accelerate the uptake of joint accreditation at the European level, expand mechanisms for mutual recognition of short courses and microcredentials, and build strong quality assurance that is transparent, scalable, and adaptable to emerging skill needs. In conclusion, the collective DEP project experience finds that a blend of European, national, and stakeholder-driven accreditation solutions is essential. These solutions should be supported by modular, interoperable learning pathways and a supranational quality assurance logic, enabling learners and institutions across Europe to benefit from flexible, high-quality education portfolios that serve both lifelong learning and labour market transformation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.