Sanctuary: Counter-oppressive Relationships with Farmed Animals as an Ecopsychological Imperative

Consumers are intentionally shielded from and often misled about the process of breeding, raising, and slaughtering animals for consumption. By confining most farmed animals to warehouses in rural areas while the majority of humans are sequestered in urban areas, we have effectively created a world where humans do not have to contend with the sense of interconnectedness that arises when witnessing and being witnessed by a farmed animal. Within industrial slaughterhouses, the physical act of killing is minimized to just a fraction of the workers, so that even those who are responsible for rendering a once living being will never encounter a live animal (Pachirat, 2011). While Ecopsychology has historically uplifted ecotherapy modalities that reinforce a species hierarchy, there is another way of relating to the nonhuman animal world that challenges the power dynamics and oppressive systems that perpetuate humans’ disconnection from the natural world. The “Sanctuary” model is one that intentionally creates sacred spaces of community, connection, and resistance against the dominant culture and does so through radical interdependence and compassion (Pachirat, 2018).

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Ecopsychology (IJE)
Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55671/2767-1380.1121
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sanctuary: Counter-oppressive Relationships with Farmed Animals as an Ecopsychological Imperative

The International Journal of Ecopsychology (IJE)
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Sanctuary: Counter-oppressive Relationships with Farmed Animals as an Ecopsychological Imperative

article en

Abstract

Consumers are intentionally shielded from and often misled about the process of breeding, raising, and slaughtering animals for consumption. By confining most farmed animals to warehouses in rural areas while the majority of humans are sequestered in urban areas, we have effectively created a world where humans do not have to contend with the sense of interconnectedness that arises when witnessing and being witnessed by a farmed animal. Within industrial slaughterhouses, the physical act of killing is minimized to just a fraction of the workers, so that even those who are responsible for rendering a once living being will never encounter a live animal (Pachirat, 2011). While Ecopsychology has historically uplifted ecotherapy modalities that reinforce a species hierarchy, there is another way of relating to the nonhuman animal world that challenges the power dynamics and oppressive systems that perpetuate humans’ disconnection from the natural world. The “Sanctuary” model is one that intentionally creates sacred spaces of community, connection, and resistance against the dominant culture and does so through radical interdependence and compassion (Pachirat, 2018).

The International Journal of Ecopsychology (IJE)Vol. 10(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sanctuary: Counter-oppressive Relationships with Farmed Animals as an Ecopsychological Imperative · The International Journal of Ecopsychology (IJE) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS