Critical Lenses on Classroom Histories: Gender, Power, and Faircloughian CDA in The Tudors: England 1485–1603

This study investigates gender representation in the history textbook The Tudors: England 1485–1603 (Oxford University Press, 2015) through Fairclough’s three-dimensional CDA, and it offers findings relevant to scholars, educators, and researchers interested in the ideological dimensions of curriculum materials. Addressing a research gap in history-textbook studies, the analysis focuses on a 500-word excerpt where women first receive individual attention. This examination prioritises the micro-level (textual features) and the macro-level (broader sociocultural practice), while interweaving meso-level considerations of discourse practice to situate analytical findings. Micro-level textual analysis reveals systematic use of passive constructions when women are acted upon, lexical choices that frame marriage as a male-controlled institution, and recurrent identification of female figures through their relationships to men. Meso-level considerations situate these patterns within textbook production and classroom use, highlighting how alignment with the National Curriculum and A-level assessment prioritises political narratives centred on male agency. The macro-level discussion connects the textbook's discourse to wider patriarchal ideologies that still shape contemporary gender disparities in the United Kingdom. The findings demonstrate that subtle linguistic choices perpetuate female passivity, reinforce male supremacy, and instrumentalise women’s reproductive roles, thereby normalising historical gender hierarchy for student readers. This article, by presenting a detailed critical discourse analysis, not only shares specific research outcomes but also aims to support the growth of educational researchers by exemplifying a methodological approach to a common challenge in curriculum studies. It argues for systematic revision of educational materials to ensure balanced representation of gender and to foster critical engagement with historical narratives, an endeavor pertinent to educators, particularly those working with high school students, and all those committed to more equitable educational practices and the exploration of marginalised perspectives in educational content.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.123113
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical Lenses on Classroom Histories: Gender, Power, and Faircloughian CDA in The Tudors: England 1485–1603

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Gender Studies in Language
article

Critical Lenses on Classroom Histories: Gender, Power, and Faircloughian CDA in The Tudors: England 1485–1603

article en

Abstract

This study investigates gender representation in the history textbook The Tudors: England 1485–1603 (Oxford University Press, 2015) through Fairclough’s three-dimensional CDA, and it offers findings relevant to scholars, educators, and researchers interested in the ideological dimensions of curriculum materials. Addressing a research gap in history-textbook studies, the analysis focuses on a 500-word excerpt where women first receive individual attention. This examination prioritises the micro-level (textual features) and the macro-level (broader sociocultural practice), while interweaving meso-level considerations of discourse practice to situate analytical findings. Micro-level textual analysis reveals systematic use of passive constructions when women are acted upon, lexical choices that frame marriage as a male-controlled institution, and recurrent identification of female figures through their relationships to men. Meso-level considerations situate these patterns within textbook production and classroom use, highlighting how alignment with the National Curriculum and A-level assessment prioritises political narratives centred on male agency. The macro-level discussion connects the textbook's discourse to wider patriarchal ideologies that still shape contemporary gender disparities in the United Kingdom. The findings demonstrate that subtle linguistic choices perpetuate female passivity, reinforce male supremacy, and instrumentalise women’s reproductive roles, thereby normalising historical gender hierarchy for student readers. This article, by presenting a detailed critical discourse analysis, not only shares specific research outcomes but also aims to support the growth of educational researchers by exemplifying a methodological approach to a common challenge in curriculum studies. It argues for systematic revision of educational materials to ensure balanced representation of gender and to foster critical engagement with historical narratives, an endeavor pertinent to educators, particularly those working with high school students, and all those committed to more equitable educational practices and the exploration of marginalised perspectives in educational content.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Gender Studies in Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.