Editorial Harmonization and the Farrer Hypothesis

Abstract: Through the Farrer Hypothesis, I offer a fresh look at the historical-literary development of two double traditions. I argue that the “exclusive” saying on neutrality (Matt 12:30 // Luke 11:23) originated as a direct inversion of Mark’s “inclusive” variant (Mark 9:40). Matthew was responsible for modifying and recontextualizing the Marcan saying, likely in an effort to harmonize it with Mark’s otherwise stringent criteria for discipleship. This scenario is shown to be more plausible than theories involving Q. I also examine an “anti-family” double tradition (Matt 10:37 // Luke 14:26). Matthew’s softer version is usually regarded as secondary. I find Lucan posteriority equally plausible; in sharpening the saying, Luke aligned it with the “two masters” principle (cf. Matt 6:24 // Luke 16:13).