Decision-Making Models for High-Risk Projects: Balancing Cost, Quality and Time

This study investigates high risk project decision-making models that aim at balancing the critical project constraints of cost, quality and time. The paper explores the different decision-making models and assesses their relevance in handling high risks settings. By applying the real-life case studies, such as the 2012 London Olympics and the 787 Dreamliner project of Boeing, the study reveals how the project managers use these models to reduce risks and maximize results. The research methodology involves the qualitative analysis, case-study analysis, and performance metrics. The main discovered outcomes are that although the traditional decision making models such as the Critical Path Method (CPM) are useful, the modern ones, such as Monte Carlo simulations and risk-based analysis, provide greater flexibility and accuracy in the high-risk situations. The paper ends with the practical implication of enhancing project management approach and suggestion of what to do in another research on adaptive decision-making models in high-risk situations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17588800
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision-Making Models for High-Risk Projects: Balancing Cost, Quality and Time

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Decision-Making Models for High-Risk Projects: Balancing Cost, Quality and Time

article en

Abstract

This study investigates high risk project decision-making models that aim at balancing the critical project constraints of cost, quality and time. The paper explores the different decision-making models and assesses their relevance in handling high risks settings. By applying the real-life case studies, such as the 2012 London Olympics and the 787 Dreamliner project of Boeing, the study reveals how the project managers use these models to reduce risks and maximize results. The research methodology involves the qualitative analysis, case-study analysis, and performance metrics. The main discovered outcomes are that although the traditional decision making models such as the Critical Path Method (CPM) are useful, the modern ones, such as Monte Carlo simulations and risk-based analysis, provide greater flexibility and accuracy in the high-risk situations. The paper ends with the practical implication of enhancing project management approach and suggestion of what to do in another research on adaptive decision-making models in high-risk situations.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Small Business Administration (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.