The paradigm of female directors in the managerial capture of sustainability assurance: an analysis supported by natural language processing methods

Purpose Sustainability assurance has become essential for enhancing the credibility of sustainability disclosures. However, without harmonized standards, critical literature highlights the risk of managerial capture and questions the effectiveness of assurance in promoting accountability. This study aims to investigate whether board gender diversity serves as a governance mechanism that reduces the risk of capture and whether a critical mass of female directors is necessary to exert a monitoring role. Design/methodology/approach Using 2,267 assurance statements from European-listed firms (2018–2022), the authors develop an index of managerial capture based on whether assurance reports evaluate compliance with established reporting principles. A higher score indicates a more comprehensive verification process and, consequently, a lower risk of managerial capture. To complement this measure, the authors assess the tone of the assurance statements, where an overly optimistic tone serves as an additional indicator of managerial capture. The monitoring role of board gender diversity is analyzed using panel data regression models and a difference-in-differences approach to account for the influence of board gender diversity regulations. Findings The results show that a critical mass of female directors (exceeding 30%) reduces the risk of managerial capture, and that gender-balanced boards (with 40%–60% female representation) are the most effective in monitoring this risk. Moreover, board gender diversity regulations further strengthen the oversight role of female directors. Originality/value This study advances the field of sustainability assurance by proposing a governance mechanism that minimizes the risk of managerial capture and illustrates the potential of natural language processing techniques for analyzing sustainability disclosures. It also demonstrates that gender-balanced boards and gender diversity regulations enhance corporate accountability.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meditari Accountancy Research
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-05-2024-2483
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The paradigm of female directors in the managerial capture of sustainability assurance: an analysis supported by natural language processing methods

Meditari Accountancy Research
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

The paradigm of female directors in the managerial capture of sustainability assurance: an analysis supported by natural language processing methods

article en

Abstract

Purpose Sustainability assurance has become essential for enhancing the credibility of sustainability disclosures. However, without harmonized standards, critical literature highlights the risk of managerial capture and questions the effectiveness of assurance in promoting accountability. This study aims to investigate whether board gender diversity serves as a governance mechanism that reduces the risk of capture and whether a critical mass of female directors is necessary to exert a monitoring role. Design/methodology/approach Using 2,267 assurance statements from European-listed firms (2018–2022), the authors develop an index of managerial capture based on whether assurance reports evaluate compliance with established reporting principles. A higher score indicates a more comprehensive verification process and, consequently, a lower risk of managerial capture. To complement this measure, the authors assess the tone of the assurance statements, where an overly optimistic tone serves as an additional indicator of managerial capture. The monitoring role of board gender diversity is analyzed using panel data regression models and a difference-in-differences approach to account for the influence of board gender diversity regulations. Findings The results show that a critical mass of female directors (exceeding 30%) reduces the risk of managerial capture, and that gender-balanced boards (with 40%–60% female representation) are the most effective in monitoring this risk. Moreover, board gender diversity regulations further strengthen the oversight role of female directors. Originality/value This study advances the field of sustainability assurance by proposing a governance mechanism that minimizes the risk of managerial capture and illustrates the potential of natural language processing techniques for analyzing sustainability disclosures. It also demonstrates that gender-balanced boards and gender diversity regulations enhance corporate accountability.

Meditari Accountancy ResearchVol. 33(5-6)
University of Cartagena (CO), Universidad de Salamanca (ES), Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.