Reluctant Candidates and Spontaneous Elections in Republican Rome

This article examines public displays of reluctance during Roman electoral campaigns. It traces an uncommon but observable trend in which certain individuals claimed not to be canvassing for or desirous of the political office to which they were subsequently elected. Using the election of Scipio Aemilianus to the consulship of 147 BCE as a point of departure, the article argues that staged reluctance was employed as a canvassing strategy by several prominent Roman politicians. Reluctance could be feigned to circumvent electoral restrictions, to enhance the reputation of the candidate, or even as a route to victory through reverse psychology. Staged reluctance was therefore an unconventional but effective republican canvassing technique. The Roman people, for their part, were presented as the primary agents in the election. The people were capable of creating a magistrate, even if the latter had not registered as an official candidate, with apparently spontaneous manifestations of popular will. This article examines how the electorate could come to vote for a non-candidate (part I) and why a non-candidate might claim or feign reluctance (part II). It concludes with an afterword on Augustus’ employment of this republican phenomenon (part III).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Classical Antiquity
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1525/ca.2025.44.2.315
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reluctant Candidates and Spontaneous Elections in Republican Rome

Classical Antiquity
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

Reluctant Candidates and Spontaneous Elections in Republican Rome

article en

Abstract

This article examines public displays of reluctance during Roman electoral campaigns. It traces an uncommon but observable trend in which certain individuals claimed not to be canvassing for or desirous of the political office to which they were subsequently elected. Using the election of Scipio Aemilianus to the consulship of 147 BCE as a point of departure, the article argues that staged reluctance was employed as a canvassing strategy by several prominent Roman politicians. Reluctance could be feigned to circumvent electoral restrictions, to enhance the reputation of the candidate, or even as a route to victory through reverse psychology. Staged reluctance was therefore an unconventional but effective republican canvassing technique. The Roman people, for their part, were presented as the primary agents in the election. The people were capable of creating a magistrate, even if the latter had not registered as an official candidate, with apparently spontaneous manifestations of popular will. This article examines how the electorate could come to vote for a non-candidate (part I) and why a non-candidate might claim or feign reluctance (part II). It concludes with an afterword on Augustus’ employment of this republican phenomenon (part III).

Classical AntiquityVol. 44(2)
Smith College (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reluctant Candidates and Spontaneous Elections in Republican Rome · Classical Antiquity (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS