Effects of new ways of working in product development - a systematic evaluation in an engineering simulator

This study explores the impact of new work practices on product development in an Engineering Simulator by comparing traditional practices with new ways of working in a compressed product development process. By introducing flexibility, digital tools, and autonomy, the study highlights improvements in individual productivity and innovation. For example, teams employing new work practices developed their first prototypes 30% faster than control groups. However, challenges in communication and team dynamics emerge, underscoring the need for structured support systems. The findings further suggest that while these modern practices foster creativity and efficiency, successful implementation at the organizational level requires balancing autonomy with clear guidelines and effective management. This study provides actionable insights for adapting new work methods to engineering environments.

Publication Details

Journal
TUHH Open Research
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15480/882.16112
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of new ways of working in product development - a systematic evaluation in an engineering simulator

TUHH Open Research
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Effects of new ways of working in product development - a systematic evaluation in an engineering simulator

article en

Abstract

This study explores the impact of new work practices on product development in an Engineering Simulator by comparing traditional practices with new ways of working in a compressed product development process. By introducing flexibility, digital tools, and autonomy, the study highlights improvements in individual productivity and innovation. For example, teams employing new work practices developed their first prototypes 30% faster than control groups. However, challenges in communication and team dynamics emerge, underscoring the need for structured support systems. The findings further suggest that while these modern practices foster creativity and efficiency, successful implementation at the organizational level requires balancing autonomy with clear guidelines and effective management. This study provides actionable insights for adapting new work methods to engineering environments.

TUHH Open Research
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.