Figure, Judgement and the Anoriginal: Notes in Response

These notes are intended to you highlight the role of the terms ‘figure’, ‘judgement’ and ‘anoriginal’ in my writings to date. They are presented as responses to the engagement with my work in the papers written by Richard Lee, Jennifer Gaffney, Joe Hughes and Carlo Salzani

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy Politics and Critique
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/ppc.2025.0091
Primary Topic
Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Figure, Judgement and the Anoriginal: Notes in Response

Philosophy Politics and Critique
Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
article

Figure, Judgement and the Anoriginal: Notes in Response

article en

Abstract

These notes are intended to you highlight the role of the terms ‘figure’, ‘judgement’ and ‘anoriginal’ in my writings to date. They are presented as responses to the engagement with my work in the papers written by Richard Lee, Jennifer Gaffney, Joe Hughes and Carlo Salzani

Philosophy Politics and CritiqueVol. 2(3)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Figure, Judgement and the Anoriginal: Notes in Response · Philosophy Politics and Critique (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS