Is there a Right to Assisted Procreation? A Reproductive Justice Approach

This essay uses the lens of reproductive justice theory to ask whether the right to procreate should extend to the right to use assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in pursuit of procreation – particularly in the historical and contemporary contexts of the United States. I begin with a brief gloss of different legal bases of a right to procreate in general, including human-rights bases not commonly used in the US. I then review four primarily rights-based arguments for expanding ART access within different regulatory scenarios, contrasting US approaches with those of other contexts. In the third section, drawing on the work of Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò, I present my justice-based argument for expanding ART access in the US as a matter of reparations for reproductive injustices faced by marginalized communities. Finally, I consider the question of whether LGBTQ+ would-be parents also have justice (as opposed to rights-based) claims to ART access.

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy Politics and Critique
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/ppc.2025.0083
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is there a Right to Assisted Procreation? A Reproductive Justice Approach

Philosophy Politics and Critique
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Is there a Right to Assisted Procreation? A Reproductive Justice Approach

article en

Abstract

This essay uses the lens of reproductive justice theory to ask whether the right to procreate should extend to the right to use assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in pursuit of procreation – particularly in the historical and contemporary contexts of the United States. I begin with a brief gloss of different legal bases of a right to procreate in general, including human-rights bases not commonly used in the US. I then review four primarily rights-based arguments for expanding ART access within different regulatory scenarios, contrasting US approaches with those of other contexts. In the third section, drawing on the work of Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò, I present my justice-based argument for expanding ART access in the US as a matter of reparations for reproductive injustices faced by marginalized communities. Finally, I consider the question of whether LGBTQ+ would-be parents also have justice (as opposed to rights-based) claims to ART access.

Philosophy Politics and CritiqueVol. 2(3)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.