The Body Reinvented: A Sadeian Grotesque Study of Gender

This paper investigates the three accounts of the libertine body in Marquis de Sade's works. The first section sketches the critique of the pathologised body by examining the construction of ‘sadism’ in Richard von Krafft-Ebing's Psychopathia Sexualis and juxtaposing it with the Sadeian, its fictional inspiration. The second section examines the construction of the libertine body through Simone de Beauvoir's essay ‘Must We Burn Sade?’, arguing that Sade's preoccupation with corporeal excess and cruelty reflects a desire for mutual recognition, aligning with her idea of agitation of flesh in The Second Sex. I interpret the revelation of striking carnality in Sadeian poetics of extremity as grotesque drawing on Mikhail Bakhtin's Rabelais and His World. The phenomenological reciprocity of the body is thus seen as a form of grotesque merger. However, the grotesque body does not satisfyingly account for the question of sexual difference. Hence, in the third section, I propose a closer focus on gender non-conformity of the libertine body through the lens of queer theory. This study reimagines difference as ‘difference-within’ rather than ‘difference-from’, challenging binary thinking and undoing the sexual difference.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy Politics and Critique
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/ppc.2025.0085
Primary Topic
Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Body Reinvented: A Sadeian Grotesque Study of Gender

Philosophy Politics and Critique
Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought
article

The Body Reinvented: A Sadeian Grotesque Study of Gender

article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the three accounts of the libertine body in Marquis de Sade's works. The first section sketches the critique of the pathologised body by examining the construction of ‘sadism’ in Richard von Krafft-Ebing's Psychopathia Sexualis and juxtaposing it with the Sadeian, its fictional inspiration. The second section examines the construction of the libertine body through Simone de Beauvoir's essay ‘Must We Burn Sade?’, arguing that Sade's preoccupation with corporeal excess and cruelty reflects a desire for mutual recognition, aligning with her idea of agitation of flesh in The Second Sex. I interpret the revelation of striking carnality in Sadeian poetics of extremity as grotesque drawing on Mikhail Bakhtin's Rabelais and His World. The phenomenological reciprocity of the body is thus seen as a form of grotesque merger. However, the grotesque body does not satisfyingly account for the question of sexual difference. Hence, in the third section, I propose a closer focus on gender non-conformity of the libertine body through the lens of queer theory. This study reimagines difference as ‘difference-within’ rather than ‘difference-from’, challenging binary thinking and undoing the sexual difference.

Philosophy Politics and CritiqueVol. 2(3)
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.