The Entangled Agency Framework: Modeling Human–Machine Collaboration in the Writing Classroom

This concept preprint introduces the Entangled Agency Framework (EAF), a model for examining how rhetorical agency circulates within human–machine writing systems. Building on theoretical foundations from Kenneth Burke's notion of symbolic action, Bruno Latour's actor–network theory, and Karen Barad's concept of intra-action, the EAF reframes writing with AI not as a contest between human control and algorithmic automation but as a dynamic ecology of interpretation. Within this ecology, agency does not reside in any single actor but emerges from the interplay of multiple variables: system (S), alignment (A, denoting AI responsiveness and fit with human intent), reflection (R), prompt (P), human labor (H), and infrastructure (I). Transparency (T), defined as the degree to which interpretive processes remain visible, modulates them all. Expressed as E = f(S, A, R, P, H, I | T), the framework offers a rhetorical and computational heuristic for tracing how meaning and responsibility shift across hybrid writing events.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2025-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/r5vsq-prx50
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Entangled Agency Framework: Modeling Human–Machine Collaboration in the Writing Classroom

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
article

The Entangled Agency Framework: Modeling Human–Machine Collaboration in the Writing Classroom

article en

Abstract

This concept preprint introduces the Entangled Agency Framework (EAF), a model for examining how rhetorical agency circulates within human–machine writing systems. Building on theoretical foundations from Kenneth Burke's notion of symbolic action, Bruno Latour's actor–network theory, and Karen Barad's concept of intra-action, the EAF reframes writing with AI not as a contest between human control and algorithmic automation but as a dynamic ecology of interpretation. Within this ecology, agency does not reside in any single actor but emerges from the interplay of multiple variables: system (S), alignment (A, denoting AI responsiveness and fit with human intent), reflection (R), prompt (P), human labor (H), and infrastructure (I). Transparency (T), defined as the degree to which interpretive processes remain visible, modulates them all. Expressed as E = f(S, A, R, P, H, I | T), the framework offers a rhetorical and computational heuristic for tracing how meaning and responsibility shift across hybrid writing events.

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Tulane University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.