Feminist Jurisography: Woman's Estate, Australia, 1970

This essay offers some observations on jurisography, an experimental practice named by the author. It draws from Feminist Jurisography: Law, History, Writing (2022) to make an argument about feminist traditions, and how they are inherited. The essay argues that feminist traditions – feminist foundations – are not necessarily forgotten, although they may not always be explicitly acknowledged. It begins with a provocation made by Simone de Beauvoir in The Second Sex (1949): that to respond adequately to one’s situation in time and place as woman requires self-creation of a persona and methodological transformation of disciplinary writing. It then examines how that provocation was adapted in the 1970s by writers in the Women’s Liberation Movement; and describes how popular books, written on the periphery of institutional life, introduced a new public persona: the feminist intellectual. Through a reading of Juliet Mitchell’s Woman’s Estate (1971) and its reception in Australia, the essay argues that regardless of whether one separates from or aligns with a textual inheritance, understanding the methodological innovations of feminist antecedents for projects in the here and now is a political act of acknowledgment.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Kent
Published
2025-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22024/unikent/03/fal.1439
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feminist Jurisography: Woman's Estate, Australia, 1970

University of Kent
Law in Society and Culture
article

Feminist Jurisography: Woman's Estate, Australia, 1970

article en

Abstract

This essay offers some observations on jurisography, an experimental practice named by the author. It draws from Feminist Jurisography: Law, History, Writing (2022) to make an argument about feminist traditions, and how they are inherited. The essay argues that feminist traditions – feminist foundations – are not necessarily forgotten, although they may not always be explicitly acknowledged. It begins with a provocation made by Simone de Beauvoir in The Second Sex (1949): that to respond adequately to one’s situation in time and place as woman requires self-creation of a persona and methodological transformation of disciplinary writing. It then examines how that provocation was adapted in the 1970s by writers in the Women’s Liberation Movement; and describes how popular books, written on the periphery of institutional life, introduced a new public persona: the feminist intellectual. Through a reading of Juliet Mitchell’s Woman’s Estate (1971) and its reception in Australia, the essay argues that regardless of whether one separates from or aligns with a textual inheritance, understanding the methodological innovations of feminist antecedents for projects in the here and now is a political act of acknowledgment.

University of Kent
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.