Sexual Politics in the Twenty-First Century: Practices of Silencing and the Continuum of Sexual Violence

This paper examines the spectrum of sexual violence that permeates women's lives, often unnoticed by most of society. To do so, I revisit arguments from Kate Millet’s Sexual Politics (1970) and Susan Brownmiller’s Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape (1975), which to a large extent gave rise to the theoretical contention that under conditions of patriarchy there is a constant coercive factor in sexuality, which is a hostile sphere for women. I go on to examine current practices of silencing that can be seen as surreptitious ways of perpetuating this continuum of sexual violence: testimonial epistemic injustice, hermeneutical epistemic injustice, the legal discourse of gender-based violence and the naturalistic discourse of sexuality. I conclude that current legal feminist scholarship has the imperative challenge of generating frames of reference that allow us to collectively and socially interpret this entire spectrum of violence.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Kent
Published
2025-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22024/unikent/03/fal.1446
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sexual Politics in the Twenty-First Century: Practices of Silencing and the Continuum of Sexual Violence

University of Kent
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
article

Sexual Politics in the Twenty-First Century: Practices of Silencing and the Continuum of Sexual Violence

article en

Abstract

This paper examines the spectrum of sexual violence that permeates women's lives, often unnoticed by most of society. To do so, I revisit arguments from Kate Millet’s Sexual Politics (1970) and Susan Brownmiller’s Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape (1975), which to a large extent gave rise to the theoretical contention that under conditions of patriarchy there is a constant coercive factor in sexuality, which is a hostile sphere for women. I go on to examine current practices of silencing that can be seen as surreptitious ways of perpetuating this continuum of sexual violence: testimonial epistemic injustice, hermeneutical epistemic injustice, the legal discourse of gender-based violence and the naturalistic discourse of sexuality. I conclude that current legal feminist scholarship has the imperative challenge of generating frames of reference that allow us to collectively and socially interpret this entire spectrum of violence.

University of Kent
University of the Basque Country (ES)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.