Comparative evaluation of the physical and mechanical properties of artificial rocks fabricated using four 3D printing technologies

Purpose This study aims to compare and evaluate the physical and mechanical properties of artificial rocks fabricated using four 3D printing (3DP) technologies, with the goal of identifying their suitability for rock mechanics applications. Design/methodology/approach Artificial rock specimens were fabricated using fused deposition modeling (FDM), stereolithography (SLA), powder-based 3DP and wet-material extrusion deposition modeling (WEDM). A comprehensive evaluation was conducted by analyzing the dimensional accuracy, surface microstructural features, ultrasonic wave velocity and mechanical behavior under uniaxial compression. Findings SLA-fabricated resin specimens achieved the highest dimensional accuracy and exhibited a nearly isotropic peak strength of 77.68 MPa. FDM-fabricated PLA specimens showed comparable dimensional accuracy but displayed pronounced plastic deformation and lower peak strength in the Z direction. Powder-based 3DP gypsum specimens exhibited the most pronounced anisotropy, with the Z-direction peak strength nearly 50% lower than the Y direction. WEDM-fabricated gypsum specimens showed relatively consistent peak strengths ranging from 7.85 to 8.73 MPa and brittle failure characterized by axial splitting, closely resembling that of natural rocks. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study presents the first systematic comparison of artificial rock specimens fabricated using four 3D printing technologies. The findings provide a scientific basis for selecting and optimizing 3DP technologies in experimental rock mechanics.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rapid Prototyping Journal
Published
2025-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-07-2025-0280
Primary Topic
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of the physical and mechanical properties of artificial rocks fabricated using four 3D printing technologies

Rapid Prototyping Journal
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
article

Comparative evaluation of the physical and mechanical properties of artificial rocks fabricated using four 3D printing technologies

article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to compare and evaluate the physical and mechanical properties of artificial rocks fabricated using four 3D printing (3DP) technologies, with the goal of identifying their suitability for rock mechanics applications. Design/methodology/approach Artificial rock specimens were fabricated using fused deposition modeling (FDM), stereolithography (SLA), powder-based 3DP and wet-material extrusion deposition modeling (WEDM). A comprehensive evaluation was conducted by analyzing the dimensional accuracy, surface microstructural features, ultrasonic wave velocity and mechanical behavior under uniaxial compression. Findings SLA-fabricated resin specimens achieved the highest dimensional accuracy and exhibited a nearly isotropic peak strength of 77.68 MPa. FDM-fabricated PLA specimens showed comparable dimensional accuracy but displayed pronounced plastic deformation and lower peak strength in the Z direction. Powder-based 3DP gypsum specimens exhibited the most pronounced anisotropy, with the Z-direction peak strength nearly 50% lower than the Y direction. WEDM-fabricated gypsum specimens showed relatively consistent peak strengths ranging from 7.85 to 8.73 MPa and brittle failure characterized by axial splitting, closely resembling that of natural rocks. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study presents the first systematic comparison of artificial rock specimens fabricated using four 3D printing technologies. The findings provide a scientific basis for selecting and optimizing 3DP technologies in experimental rock mechanics.

Rapid Prototyping JournalVol. 32(3)
Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics (CN), Northeastern University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative evaluation of the physical and mechanical properties of artificial rocks fabricated using four 3D printing technologies · Rapid Prototyping Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS